Literature DB >> 8337889

Comparison of factors influencing the prognosis of Japanese, German, and Dutch gastric cancer patients.

J J Bonenkamp1, C J van de Velde, G H Kampschöer, J Hermans, P Hermanek, M Bemelmans, D J Gouma, M Sasako, K Maruyama.   

Abstract

As a result of Japanese reports of improved survival of gastric cancer patients after extended lymph node dissection, a study was undertaken to evaluate factors that might influence these results. The influence of staging was evaluated by stratifying 1085 patients of the National Cancer Center of Japan and grouping them according to the three commonly used systems; UICC's old and new TNM systems (fourth edition) and the system of the Japanese Research Society for the study of Gastric Cancer (JRSGC). No survival difference was found between the stages of the three systems, except for stage II, where the new TNM and the JRSGC differed (p < 0.05). In a second analysis, the incidence of the most important prognostic factors for advanced gastric cancer was compared among three institutions: the National Cancer Center Tokyo, Japan (NCC), the University Hospital Erlangen, Germany (UHE) and the University Hospital Maastricht in The Netherlands (UHM). Japanese patients were on average 3 years younger than the German patients and 8 years younger than the Dutch patients, and had a higher proportion of advanced (T4) carcinomas. Male-female distribution, histology, and lymph node invasion were comparable in the three groups. From these data a rather worse prognosis for Japanese advanced gastric cancer patients could be expected. However, the observed 5-year survival rates show a marked advantage for the Japanese patients: 57% (NCC) versus 34% (UHE) and 31% (UHM). The survival difference for stage II patients between the new TNM and the JRSGC staging systems is not sufficient to explain this advantage. This result underlines the importance of the Japanese therapeutic approach.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8337889     DOI: 10.1007/bf01658714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  19 in total

1.  R2 compared with R1 resection for gastric cancer: morbidity and mortality in a prospective, randomised trial.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; C J van de Velde; M Sasako; J Hermans
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1992-08

2.  Quality control of surgical technique in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study on the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  M Sasako; K Maruyama; T Kinoshita; J J Bonenkamp; C J van de Velde; J Hermans
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Results of gastric resection for carcinoma of the stomach: the European experience.

Authors:  G Heberer; R K Teichmann; H J Krämling; B Günther
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Gastric carcinoma in young adults.

Authors:  P J Matley; D M Dent; M V Madden; S K Price
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Non-ominous micrometastases of gastric cancer.

Authors:  P Gunvén; K Maruyama; K Okabayashi; M Sasako; T Kinoshita
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Lymph node metastases. Indicators, but not governors of survival.

Authors:  B Cady
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1984-09

7.  The relationship of blood transfusion, tumor staging, and cancer recurrence.

Authors:  N Blumberg; C Chuang-Stein; J M Heal
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Mass screening for gastric cancer by X-ray examination.

Authors:  S Hisamichi; N Sugawara
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Gastric cancer detected by mass survey. Comparison between mass survey and outpatient detection.

Authors:  G H Kampschöer; A Fujii; Y Masuda
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of surgery for non-curative gastric cancer.

Authors:  Alyson L Mahar; Natalie G Coburn; Simron Singh; Calvin Law; Lucy K Helyer
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 2.  Lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer in clinical trials: update.

Authors:  J D Roder; J J Bonenkamp; J Craven; C J van de Velde; M Sasako; K Böttcher; H J Stein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Examining the gastric cancer survival gap between Asians and whites in the United States.

Authors:  Hongbin Jin; Paulo S Pinheiro; Karen E Callahan; Sean F Altekruse
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Risk factors for pancreas-related abscess after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hitoshi Katai; Kimio Yoshimura; Takeo Fukagawa; Takeshi Sano; Mitsuru Sasako
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Effect of body mass index in patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer: a single center US experience.

Authors:  Joyce Wong; Shams Rahman; Nadia Saeed; Hui-Yi Lin; Khaldoun Almhanna; Ravi Shridhar; Sarah Hoffe; Kenneth L Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Cancer of the stomach: a review of two hospitals in Korea and Japan.

Authors:  W J Lee; K M Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A pilot study of S-1 plus cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin for postoperative chemotherapy in histological stage IIIB-IV (M0) gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sung Sook Lee; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sung Hoon Noh; Woo Jin Hyung; Ji Yeong Ahn; Sun Young Rha
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Prognostic factors and availability of D2 lymph node dissection for the patients with stage II gastric cancer: comparative analysis of subgroups in stage II.

Authors:  Joong-Min Park; Jong-Han Kim; Sung-Soo Park; Seung-Joo Kim; Young-Jae Mok; Chong-Suk Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Gastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Maurizio Degiuli; Giovanni De Manzoni; Alberto Di Leo; Domenico D'Ugo; Erica Galasso; Daniele Marrelli; Roberto Petrioli; Karol Polom; Franco Roviello; Francesco Santullo; Mario Morino
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Treatment and outcomes of gastric cancer among United States-born and foreign-born Asians and Pacific Islanders.

Authors:  Stacey A Dacosta Byfield; Craig C Earle; John Z Ayanian; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.