Literature DB >> 8337554

Cox regression models for quality adjusted survival analysis.

B F Cole1, R D Gelber, A Goldhirsch.   

Abstract

We develop a method for incorporating covariates as regressors in a quality adjusted survival analysis (Q-TWiST) using Cox's proportional hazards model. The standard Q-TWiST method assumes that patients progress through a series of health states which differ in quality of life. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method is used to estimate the mean duration of each state by estimating the survival curves for the health state transition times. These estimates provide the basis for quality adjusted survival analysis. In this paper, the survival curves are modelled using Cox's proportional hazards regression. Quality adjusted survival is estimated given sets of covariate values, allowing one to profile patients. The results are useful for investigating how prognostic factors affect treatment benefits in terms of quality of life. We give a brief review of the standard Q-TWiST method and illustrate the extended methodology with an example from the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial V comparing short duration versus long duration chemotherapy in the treatment of node-positive breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8337554     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780121009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of longitudinal health-related quality of life data with terminal events.

Authors:  Zhezhen Jin; Mengling Liu; Steven Albert; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Testing transition probability matrix of a multi-state model with censored data.

Authors:  Prabhanjan Narayanachar Tattar; H Jalikop H Vaman
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Bayesian Regression Models for the Quality Adjusted Lifetime Data with Zero Time Duration Health States.

Authors:  Kaushal K Mishra; Sujit K Ghosh
Journal:  J Stat Theory Pract       Date:  2011-11-30

4.  Analyzing composite outcomes in cardiovascular studies: traditional Cox proportional hazards versus quality-of-life-adjusted survival approaches.

Authors:  Dean T Eurich; Sumit R Majumdar; Finlay A McAlister; Ross T Tsuyuki; Yutaka Yasui; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2010-02-23

5.  Quality of life assessment in clinical cancer research.

Authors:  M Olschewski; G Schulgen; M Schumacher; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Comparative quality-adjusted survival analysis between radiation therapy alone and radiation with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31 with novel decision analysis methods.

Authors:  Soyeon Ahn; Minjung Lee; Chang Wook Jeong
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2018-02-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.