J A Rock1, J A Truglia, R J Caplan. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, endocrine effects, and safety of Zoladex (goserelin acetate) and danazol in the treatment of premenopausal women with endometriosis in a multicenter, randomized, open study. METHODS:Three hundred fifteen patients with stages I-IV endometriosis (revised American Fertility Society [AFS] classification) were treated with Zoladex, 3.6 mg every 28 days by subcutaneous injection, or danazol, 400 mg orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by determination of pelvic signs and symptoms scores and revised AFS endometriosis scores. Endocrine effects were determined by measurements of hormone levels. Safety was evaluated by physical examination, laboratory indices, occurrence of adverse events, and bone mineral density changes. RESULTS: Both treatments significantly (P < .0001) reduced mean subjective signs and symptoms scores both during and after therapy. The mean percent reduction in the revised AFS endometriosis score after 24 weeks of treatment was 53% for Zoladex and 33% for danazol, and reduction in the endometrial implants score was 56% for Zoladex and 46% for danazol. Serum estradiol levels decreased to the postmenopausal range in the Zoladex group and to the early follicular phase range in the danazol group. Hypoestrogenic effects occurred more frequently with Zoladex, whereas androgenic side effects were more common with danazol. There was a higher percentage of withdrawals due to adverse events with danazol than with Zoladex. Mean bone mineral density decreased from baseline by 5.4% in the Zoladex group and increased by 1.0% in the danazol group at the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: Zoladex is as well tolerated and as effective as danazol in the treatment of premenopausal women with endometriosis.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, endocrine effects, and safety of Zoladex (goserelin acetate) and danazol in the treatment of premenopausal women with endometriosis in a multicenter, randomized, open study. METHODS: Three hundred fifteen patients with stages I-IV endometriosis (revised American Fertility Society [AFS] classification) were treated with Zoladex, 3.6 mg every 28 days by subcutaneous injection, or danazol, 400 mg orally twice daily for 24 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by determination of pelvic signs and symptoms scores and revised AFS endometriosis scores. Endocrine effects were determined by measurements of hormone levels. Safety was evaluated by physical examination, laboratory indices, occurrence of adverse events, and bone mineral density changes. RESULTS: Both treatments significantly (P < .0001) reduced mean subjective signs and symptoms scores both during and after therapy. The mean percent reduction in the revised AFS endometriosis score after 24 weeks of treatment was 53% for Zoladex and 33% for danazol, and reduction in the endometrial implants score was 56% for Zoladex and 46% for danazol. Serum estradiol levels decreased to the postmenopausal range in the Zoladex group and to the early follicular phase range in the danazol group. Hypoestrogenic effects occurred more frequently with Zoladex, whereas androgenic side effects were more common with danazol. There was a higher percentage of withdrawals due to adverse events with danazol than with Zoladex. Mean bone mineral density decreased from baseline by 5.4% in the Zoladex group and increased by 1.0% in the danazol group at the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: Zoladex is as well tolerated and as effective as danazol in the treatment of premenopausal women with endometriosis.
Authors: Angelo Agostoni; Emel Aygören-Pürsün; Karen E Binkley; Alvaro Blanch; Konrad Bork; Laurence Bouillet; Christoph Bucher; Anthony J Castaldo; Marco Cicardi; Alvin E Davis; Caterina De Carolis; Christian Drouet; Christiane Duponchel; Henriette Farkas; Kálmán Fáy; Béla Fekete; Bettina Fischer; Luigi Fontana; George Füst; Roberto Giacomelli; Albrecht Gröner; C Erik Hack; George Harmat; John Jakenfelds; Mathias Juers; Lajos Kalmár; Pál N Kaposi; István Karádi; Arianna Kitzinger; Tímea Kollár; Wolfhart Kreuz; Peter Lakatos; Hilary J Longhurst; Margarita Lopez-Trascasa; Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer; Nicole Monnier; István Nagy; Eva Németh; Erik Waage Nielsen; Jan H Nuijens; Caroline O'grady; Emanuela Pappalardo; Vincenzo Penna; Carlo Perricone; Roberto Perricone; Ursula Rauch; Olga Roche; Eva Rusicke; Peter J Späth; George Szendei; Edit Takács; Attila Tordai; Lennart Truedsson; Lilian Varga; Beáta Visy; Kayla Williams; Andrea Zanichelli; Lorenza Zingale Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.793