Literature DB >> 8336510

Variation in the rate of cervical spine surgery in Washington State.

D Einstadter1, D L Kent, S D Fihn, R A Deyo.   

Abstract

Lack of consensus about the treatment of low back pain is reflected by wide regional variations in lumbar spine surgery rates. Neck pain may be as common as low back pain, but there has been no similar evaluation of regional variation for the surgical treatment of neck pain. This report examines the geographic variation and temporal trends in the rate of cervical spine surgery in Washington state from 1986 through 1989. Using diagnosis and procedure codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 CM), the authors retrospectively identified cervical spine surgery cases from a statewide hospital discharge registry for Washington. After excluding cases associated with trauma, infection, or malignancy, 5,173 incident cervical spine surgery cases were analyzed. Cervical spine surgery was performed at approximately 25% the rate of lumbar spine surgery, and from 1986 to 1989, the age- and gender-adjusted rate increased 20%. Small area analysis demonstrated a sevenfold variation among counties in the rate of cervical spine surgery (P < 0.001), with variation of fourfold to 13-fold for specific surgical procedures. These data demonstrate that cervical spine surgery for neck pain is an increasingly common procedure with wide geographic variability. Rational treatment of neck pain requires further definition of indications for cervical spine surgery, preferably based on firm data concerning the outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8336510     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199308000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  8 in total

1.  Hospitalizations for back and neck problems: a comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State.

Authors:  V M Taylor; G M Anderson; B McNeney; P Diehr; J N Lavis; R A Deyo; C Bombardier; A Malter; T Axcell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Geographic variation in the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease: American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative; part II candidates.

Authors:  Kevin J McGuire; John Harrast; Harry Herkowitz; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems.

Authors:  J N Lavis; A Malter; G M Anderson; V M Taylor; R A Deyo; C Bombardier; T Axcell; W Kreuter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Identifying neck and back pain in administrative data: defining the right cohort.

Authors:  Patricia L Sinnott; Andrew M Siroka; Andrea C Shane; Jodie A Trafton; Todd H Wagner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Predictors of outcomes and hospital charges following atlantoaxial fusion.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Daniel Lubelski; Benjamin P Rosenbaum; Nicolas R Thompson; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Trends and Cost of Posterior Cervical Fusions With and Without Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in the US Medicare Population.

Authors:  Sue Lynn Myhre; Zorica Buser; Hans-Joerg Meisel; Darrel S Brodke; S Tim Yoon; Jeffrey C Wang; Jong-Beom Park; Jim A Youssef
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07

7.  Surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease in Finland, 1999-2015.

Authors:  Anna Kotkansalo; Ville Leinonen; Merja Korajoki; Jyrki Salmenkivi; Katariina Korhonen; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Validity of Algorithms for Identification of Individuals Suffering from Chronic Noncancer Pain in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anaïs Lacasse; Elizabeth Cauvier Charest; Roxanne Dault; Anne-Marie Cloutier; Manon Choinière; Lucie Blais; Alain Vanasse
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.750

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.