Literature DB >> 833609

Motor consequences of motor area ablations in man.

D Laplane, J Talairach, V Meininger, J Bancaud, A Bouchareine.   

Abstract

Motor disorders reported in the present paper do not result from cortical ablations stricto sensu since some white matter was excised in every patient. However they appear to suggest that, as suggested by Walshe (1935), the central region and premotor area are a functional entity, i.e. they work as a whole. The extensive lesions of the premotor area, leaving untouched the motor region, have the same motor and tonic consequences as lesions limited to the central region. This point which appears specific for man does not imply that the premotor region subserves activities similar to those subserved by the central region. Rather it may suggest a deafferentiation of the central region, the consequences of which would be more important than is generally assumed. Extensive central or premotor lesions determine various tonic disorders: a well known spasticity, with exaggeration of the stretch reflex, associated with an increase in passive swinging of segments of limbs and in extensibility of joints. These two latter phenomena are usually defined as hypotonia. With premotor and precentral lesions the hypotonia disappears and a hemiplegic posture is observed. This hemiplegic posture is a dystonia which apparently does not result directly from the exaggeration of the stretch reflex. Anatomically it appears to result from lesions of both central and premotor regions. This is in agreement with Denny-Brown's (1966) contention that an extrapyramidal region lies rostral to the prerolandic sulcus. As suggested by Evarts (1973) motor regions appear to control automatic as well as voluntary movements. They probably play a role in the trophic function of muscle, since, despite rehabilitation, amyotrophy was present in every case reported in the present paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 833609     DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(77)90004-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  6 in total

Review 1.  Motor cortex - to act or not to act?

Authors:  Christian Laut Ebbesen; Michael Brecht
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Hemispheric control of unilateral and bilateral movements of proximal and distal parts of the arm as inferred from simple reaction time to lateralized light stimuli in man.

Authors:  M Di Stefano; M Morelli; C A Marzi; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Imbalanced Corticospinal and Reticulospinal Contributions to Spasticity in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Volumetric effects of motor cortex injury on recovery of dexterous movements.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Marc A Pizzimenti; Diane L Rotella; Clayton R Peterson; Stephanie M Hynes; Jizhi Ge; Kathryn Solon; David W McNeal; Kimberly S Stilwell-Morecraft; Robert J Morecraft
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Minimal forced use without constraint stimulates spontaneous use of the impaired upper extremity following motor cortex injury.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Marc A Pizzimenti; Diane L Rotella; Stephanie M Hynes; Jizhi Ge; Kimberly S Stilwell-Morecraft; Tyler Vanadurongvan; David W McNeal; Kathryn M Solon-Cline; Robert J Morecraft
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Abnormal cortical sensorimotor activity during "Target" sound detection in subjects with acute acoustic trauma sequelae: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Agnès Job; Yoann Pons; Laurent Lamalle; Assia Jaillard; Karl Buck; Christoph Segebarth; Chantal Delon-Martin
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.708

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.