Literature DB >> 8335665

Salvage, with arthrodesis, in intractable diabetic neuropathic arthropathy of the foot and ankle.

J Papa1, M Myerson, P Girard.   

Abstract

Twenty-nine patients who had diabetic neuropathic arthropathy of the foot and ankle were managed with open reduction and arthrodesis of various joints. Rigid internal fixation was used in all but four patients, who had external fixation. All patients had severe instability or a fixed deformity that precluded successful treatment with bracing. The sites of the fracture-dislocations or the neuropathic dislocations were the ankle in twenty-one patients, the subtalar joint in six, and the transverse tarsal joint in two. The ankle-brachial Doppler indices of these patients averaged 0.86 (range, 0.55 to 1.14). The involved extremities were graded at the initial evaluations according to the Wagner classification system for neuropathic ulceration. The grade was 0 in fourteen patients, I in seven, II in two, and III in six. A tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis was performed after a talectomy in eleven patients; a tibiotalar arthrodesis, in eight; a triple arthrodesis, in six; a pantalar arthrodesis, in two; and a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, in two. Postoperatively, all patients remained non-weight-bearing and wore a below-the-knee plaster cast for two months. Weight-bearing was then begun with the leg in a total-contact plaster cast, and use of the cast was continued for a mean of five months (range, four to fourteen months). Thereafter, a polypropylene ankle-foot orthosis was used permanently. The most recent evaluation of the patients was performed at an average of forty-two months (range, fourteen to sixty-eight months) after the arthrodesis. There were twenty complications in nineteen of the twenty-nine patients, and there were nine pseudarthroses (six tibiocalcaneal, one tibiotalar, and two talonavicular). However, seven of the pseudarthroses were clinically stable. In these patients, the arthrodesis was performed as an alternative to amputation, and salvage was successful in twenty-seven (93 per cent) of the twenty-nine patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8335665     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199307000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Causes of failed osteosynthesis of ankle fractures].

Authors:  R Holz; B Füchtmeier; E Mayr
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Charcot foot reconstruction with combined internal and external fixation: case report.

Authors:  Claire M Capobianco; Crystal L Ramanujam; Thomas Zgonis
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 3.  [Surgical treatment of the Charcot foot : long-term results and systematic review].

Authors:  N Hartig; S Krenn; H-J Trnka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Bone, sweet bone--osteoporotic fractures in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Christine Hamann; Stephan Kirschner; Klaus-Peter Günther; Lorenz C Hofbauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint using angle-stable mini-plates: a prospective study.

Authors:  Philipp Lechler; Stephanie Graf; Franz Xaver Köck; Jens Schaumburger; Joachim Grifka; Martin Handel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Closed reposition of an acute midfoot luxation fracture in Charcot arthropathy with the ring fixator].

Authors:  P Delhey; D Bürklein; S Kessler; C Volkering
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  [Preserving foot surgery for diabetics].

Authors:  S Müller; W Wenz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  [Reconstructive foot surgery in cases of diabetic-neuropathic osteoarthropathy].

Authors:  A Koller; U Hafkemeyer; R Fiedler; H H Wetz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  [Why do osteosyntheses fail? The problem with biomechanics and biology].

Authors:  F Kutscha-Lissberg; K F Hopf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 10.  [Charcot foot. Current situation and outlook].

Authors:  T Mittlmeier; K Klaue; P Haar; M Beck
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.