Literature DB >> 8334235

Cancer incidence by ethnic group in the Northwest Territories (NWT) 1969-1988.

L A Gaudette1, R N Gao, S Freitag, M Wideman.   

Abstract

Clear differences occurred in the cancer patterns among the population sub-groups in the NWT. When compared to those for the total Canadian population, rates for all cancers tended to be higher than expected among Inuit, lower than expected among Status Indians, and at expected levels for the Other NWT population. Among Inuit, traditional patterns still persist. Cancers of the lung, cervix, nasopharynx and salivary gland, and choriocarcinoma, occurred more often, and cancers of the breast, prostate, uterus and colon less often than in the total Canadian population. Among Status Indians, small numbers precluded definitive conclusions. However, several cancer sites occurred less often than expected, including colon, bladder and prostate among males, and uterus in females. While no cancer was significantly elevated in either males or females, SIRs for cervix and lung were above 1.0 for females, and kidney cancer was significantly higher when data for both sexes were combined (SIR = 2.0). For the Other NWT group--comprising about 50% of the population--most types of cancers occurred at about the expected rate, except that lung cancer was significantly elevated in females. Nevertheless, the generally high rates for lung and cervical cancer, which were particularly evident among the Inuit, are clearly targets for prevention programmes. It is hoped the cancer registry data now available for twenty years for the NWT, as well as for the overall Canadian Inuit population, can be used by researchers for studies to further determine the etiology of cancers, especially where distinctive patterns occur in these populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8334235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Rep        ISSN: 0840-6529            Impact factor:   4.796


  6 in total

1.  The north-south gradient in health: analytic applications for public health.

Authors:  P J Veugelers; A M Yip; D Mq
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  Questionable data and preconceptions: reconsidering the value of mammography for American Indian Women.

Authors:  M R Partin; J E Korn; J S Slater
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Aboriginal health.

Authors:  H L MacMillan; A B MacMillan; D R Offord; J L Dingle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Community-based cultural predictors of Pap smear screening in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Grace M Johnston; Christopher J Boyd; Margery A MacIsaac
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

Review 5.  Cervicovaginal screening in women with HIV infection: a need for increased vigilance?

Authors:  C A Hankins; J A Lamont; M A Handley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Comparison of Pap Smear and Colposcopy in Screening for Cervical Cancer in Patients with Secondary Immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Mojgan Karimi-Zarchi; Leila Zanbagh; Alireza Shafii; Shokouh Taghipour-Zahir; Soraya Teimoori; Pouria Yazdian-Anari
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2015-11-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.