Literature DB >> 8333426

Occupational injuries: comparing the rates of male and female postal workers.

C Zwerling1, N L Sprince, J Ryan, M P Jones.   

Abstract

To compare the injury rates of male and female postal workers, the authors reanalyzed data on a cohort of 2,337 new postal employees in Boston, Massachusetts, hired between 1986 and 1989. The analysis controlled for potential confounding by age, race, smoking status, and drug use. Using Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent variables, the authors found that, compared with men, women had an increased relative risk for occupational injuries in each of the three largest job classifications: letter carrier, letter-sorting machine clerk, and mail handler. The relative risks were not constant over time. For letter carriers and letter-sorting machine clerks, the increased risks for women were noted only during the first year of employment (relative risk (RR) = 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-2.67) and RR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.31-5.15, respectively). For mail handlers, the increased risks for women were noted only after the first year of employment (RR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.09-4.15). As the percentage of women in the work force increases, these results suggest the need for further research to define sex-specific injury risks and to devise prevention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8333426     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  9 in total

1.  Risk factors for occupational knee related disability among enlisted women in the US Army.

Authors:  S I Sulsky; K A Mundt; C Bigelow; P J Amoroso
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Sex differences in injury patterns among workers in heavy manufacturing.

Authors:  Oyebode A Taiwo; Linda F Cantley; Martin D Slade; Keshia M Pollack; Sally Vegso; Martha G Fiellin; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Does occupation explain gender and other differences in work-related eye injury hospitalization rates?

Authors:  Gordon S Smith; Andrew E Lincoln; Tien Y Wong; Nicole S Bell; Paul F Vinger; Paul J Amoroso; David A Lombardi
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  The effect of pinch span on pinch force sense in healthy participants.

Authors:  Lin Li; Yan-Xia Li; Chong-Long Zhang; Dong-Hai Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Sex differences in the shoulder joint position sense acuity: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Amir K Vafadar; Julie N Côté; Philippe S Archambault
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Epidemiology of occupational accidents in iran based on social security organization database.

Authors:  Ramin Mehrdad; Shahdokht Seifmanesh; Farzaneh Chavoshi; Omid Aminian; Nazanin Izadi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

7.  Associations between employee and manager gender: impacts on gender-specific risk of acute occupational injury in metal manufacturing.

Authors:  Jessica T Kubo; Mark R Cullen; Manisha Desai; Sepideh Modrek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Occupational injury risk by sex in a manufacturing cohort.

Authors:  Baylah Tessier-Sherman; Linda F Cantley; Deron Galusha; Martin D Slade; Oyebode A Taiwo; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Effect of Force Level and Gender on Pinch Force Perception in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Lin Li; Yanxia Li; Huihui Wang; Wenqi Chen; Xinyu Liu
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-05-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.