Literature DB >> 8331606

Three modes of spatiotemporal preprocessing by eyes.

J H van Hateren1.   

Abstract

1. Optimal spatiotemporal filters for early vision were computed as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and alpha, a parameter defined as the ratio of the width of the probability distribution of velocities as perceived by the naturally behaving animal, and the characteristic velocity of the photoreceptors (the velocity required to move across a receptor's receptive field in a receptor's integration time). Animals that move slowly, on average, compared with the characteristic velocity of their photoreceptors have alpha << 1, animals that move fast have alpha >> 1. 2. For alpha << 1, the temporal part of the optimal filter adapts more to different SNRs (light levels) than the spatial part, leading to large adjustments in temporal resolving power and strong self-inhibition at high SNR, but little lateral inhibition. 3. For alpha >> 1, the spatial part of the filter adapts more strongly than the temporal part, leading to strong lateral inhibition at high SNR, and little self-inhibition. 4. For alpha approximately 1, both spatial and temporal properties change about equally much when varying SNR. 5. Varying the width of the angular sensitivity of the photoreceptors shows that for every combination of alpha and SNR there is an optimal width. Visual systems with large alpha need wider angular sensitivities, in particular at low SNR, in order to reach the information maximum than visual systems with small alpha.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8331606     DOI: 10.1007/bf00213681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  11 in total

1.  The effect of motion on visual acuity of the compound eye: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; G D Bernard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Real and optimal neural images in early vision.

Authors:  J H van Hateren
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-11-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Color and spatial structure in natural scenes.

Authors:  G J Burton; I R Moorhead
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1987-01-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Motion detection and adaptation in crayfish photoreceptors. A spatiotemporal analysis of linear movement sensitivity.

Authors:  R M Glantz
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  [Exposure potentials and vision of insects; examination of Calliphora and Dixippus].

Authors:  H AUTRUM
Journal:  Z Vgl Physiol       Date:  1950

6.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina.

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; S B Laughlin; A Dubs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-11-22

8.  Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of early vision.

Authors:  J H Van Hateren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Transducer noise in a photoreceptor.

Authors:  P G Lillywhite; S B Laughlin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The influence of temporal frequency and adaptation level on receptive field organization of retinal ganglion cells in cat.

Authors:  A M Derrington; P Lennie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  5 in total

1.  Caste-specific visual adaptations to distinct daily activity schedules in Australian Myrmecia ants.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra; Samuel F Reid; Birgit Greiner; Richard A Peters; Jan M Hemmi; Willi A Ribi; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Higher-order neural processing tunes motion neurons to visual ecology in three species of hawkmoths.

Authors:  A L Stöckl; D O'Carroll; E J Warrant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Microsaccadic sampling of moving image information provides Drosophila hyperacute vision.

Authors:  Mikko Juusola; An Dau; Zhuoyi Song; Narendra Solanki; Diana Rien; David Jaciuch; Sidhartha Anil Dongre; Florence Blanchard; Gonzalo G de Polavieja; Roger C Hardie; Jouni Takalo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Compound eye adaptations for diurnal and nocturnal lifestyle in the intertidal ant, Polyrhachis sokolova.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra; Ali Alkaladi; Chloé A Raderschall; Simon K A Robson; Willi A Ribi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spatial vision in insects is facilitated by shaping the dynamics of visual input through behavioral action.

Authors:  Martin Egelhaaf; Norbert Boeddeker; Roland Kern; Rafael Kurtz; Jens P Lindemann
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.