Literature DB >> 8330469

Adverse effects of low-dose aspirin in a healthy elderly population.

C A Silagy1, J J McNeil, G A Donnan, A M Tonkin, B Worsam, K Campion.   

Abstract

The adverse effects of low-dose aspirin (100 mg daily) in the elderly were studied over a 12-month period in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 400 subjects who were 70 years of age or older and had no preexisting major vascular diseases at the time of entry. Subjects were randomized so that 200 subjects received low-dose enteric-coated aspirin (100 mg daily) and 200 subjects received placebo. Compliance with medication, assessed by pill count, was 86%. Gastrointestinal symptoms were reported by 18% (n = 36) of participants receiving aspirin and 13% (n = 26) of those receiving placebo. Clinically evident gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 3% (n = 6) of subjects receiving aspirin and none receiving placebo. Aspirin-treated subjects had a significant decrease in mean hemoglobin levels of 0.33 gm/dl during the 12-month study period, which was significantly greater than the decrease in the placebo-treated group (0.11 gm/dl; p < 0.05). These rates of unwanted symptoms are comparable with previous studies that used higher doses of aspirin. Until the risk-benefit trade-off from the use of low-dose aspirin in the elderly is established with an appropriate clinical trial, caution should be exercised when this compound is used for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in this age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8330469     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1993.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  29 in total

Review 1.  Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in the elderly.

Authors:  Christopher J Bulpitt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A randomised controlled trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of fractures in healthy older people: protocol for the ASPREE-Fracture substudy.

Authors:  Anna L Barker; John J McNeil; Ego Seeman; Stephanie A Ward; Kerrie M Sanders; Sundeep Khosla; Robert G Cumming; Julie A Pasco; Megan A Bohensky; Peter R Ebeling; Robyn L Woods; Jessica E Lockery; Rory Wolfe; Jason Talevski
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 3.  Gastric toxicity of antiplatelet therapy with low-dose aspirin.

Authors:  M Guslandi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid use and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Vera E Valkhoff; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Catherine Hill; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  Prophylaxis and treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal disorders.

Authors:  R La Corte; M Caselli; G Castellino; G Bajocchi; F Trotta
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for elderly people in Alberta.

Authors:  D B Hogan; N R Campbell; R Crutcher; P Jennett; N MacLeod
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Is there an association between low dose aspirin and anemia (without overt bleeding)? Narrative review.

Authors:  Helen Gaskell; Sheena Derry; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events in the elderly.

Authors:  Isabelle Mahé; Alain Leizorovicz; Charles Caulin; Jean-François Bergmann
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Rationale for a trial of low-dose aspirin for the primary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events and vascular dementia in the elderly: Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE).

Authors:  Mark Nelson; Christopher Reid; Lawrence Beilin; Geoffrey Donnan; Colin Johnston; Henry Krum; Elsdon Storey; Andrew Tonkin; John McNeil
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 1. Influence of reporting methods on perception of benefits.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.