Literature DB >> 8327698

Breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy: diagnosis with mammography and US.

T J Rissanen1, H P Mäkäräinen, S I Mattila, E L Lindholm, M I Heikkinen, H O Kiviniemi.   

Abstract

The authors reviewed mammograms and/or ultrasound (US) scans of 76 lesions (67 patients) suspected of being recurrent breast cancer. All patients had previously undergone mastectomy. Sixty-one cases were malignant disease and 15 were benign. Mammography and US were complementary to clinical examination in evaluating palpable lesions at the mastectomy site. Both imaging methods revealed nonpalpable recurrences. The sensitivity of US was 91%, whereas the sensitivities of clinical examination and mammography were 79% and 45%, respectively. US was the best imaging method for evaluating tumors in the chest wall far from the scar and in the axilla, as these could not be visualized on mammograms. Most recurrent cancers were seen as circumscribed masses at mammography and as hypoechoic lesions at US. Hyperechoic recurrences could not be differentiated from benign lesions. The value of early detection of recurrences with imaging methods remains to be seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8327698     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Scintimammography in conjunction with ultrasonography for local breast cancer recurrence in post-mastectomy breast.

Authors:  S Usmani; H Khan; N Ahmed; F Marafi; N Garvie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  FDG-PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; Yuan Han; XiaoGuang Sun; JianJun Liu; Huang Gang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The emergence of diagnostic imaging technologies in breast cancer: discovery, regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption in clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Laura S Gold; Gregory Klein; Lauren Carr; Larry Kessler; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Palpable Lumps after Mastectomy: Radiologic-Pathologic Review of Benign and Malignant Masses.

Authors:  Rend Al-Khalili; Ali Alzeer; Giang-Kimthi Nguyen; Erin P Crane; Judy H Song; Janice L Jeon; Michael Nellamattathil; Erini V Makariou; Victoria L Mango
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 5.  Imaging surveillance of patients with breast cancer after primary treatment: current recommendations.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  'Under' Surveillance: Impact of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Post-Treatment Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Lucy M De La Cruz; Lawrence N Shulman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.