Literature DB >> 8326892

Medical certification of causes of death in an Australian metropolitan hospital. Comparison with autopsy findings and a critical review.

P A McKelvie1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the causes of deaths recorded on death certificates with findings at autopsy and to identify other deficiencies in the completion of death certificates. DESIGN AND
SETTING: The causes of death (Part I and II) recorded on the death certificates of all patients undergoing autopsy at St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, in 1992 were compared with the autopsy findings. Additional clinical information about previous medical and surgical history and antemortem investigations was obtained from the clinical summary in the autopsy reports, and from hospital charts in some cases. PATIENTS: In 1992, 132 hospital autopsies were performed (autopsy rate of 24.2%). Of these patients, 68% were aged 65 years or over, and 30% were aged 75 years or over.
RESULTS: Major discrepancies between the cause of death listed on the certificates and autopsy findings were found in 16 cases (12%). Other deficiencies of death certification included listing the mode of death (e.g., cardiac failure) without an underlying cause in 14 cases (11%); failure to cite recent major surgery in 17 of 20 cases (85%); failure to specify site or organism in 33 of 40 cases (82.5%) of infection or sepsis.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed findings of previous studies with respect to missed major diagnoses, but identified other deficiencies in certification of causes of death, which could compromise accuracy of statistics obtained from death certificates. Mechanisms by which these deficiencies can be prevented or corrected are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8326892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  8 in total

1.  Do doctors read forms? A one-year audit of medical certificates submitted to a crematorium.

Authors:  J S Horner; J W Horner
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Improving the accuracy of death certification.

Authors:  K A Myers; D R Farquhar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-05-19       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Are coroners' necropsies necessary? A prospective study examining whether a "view and grant" system of death certification could be introduced into England and Wales.

Authors:  G N Rutty; R M Duerden; N Carter; J C Clark
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Death certification and doctors' dilemmas: a qualitative study of GPs' perspectives.

Authors:  Carol McAllum; Ian St George; Gillian White
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Information on death certificates: cause for concern?

Authors:  D S James; A D Bull
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous U. S. counties.

Authors:  J Rush Pierce; Anne V Denison
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2006-06-26

7.  Differences in place of death between lung cancer and COPD patients: a 14-country study using death certificate data.

Authors:  Joachim Cohen; Kim Beernaert; Lieve Van den Block; Lucas Morin; Katherine Hunt; Guido Miccinesi; Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas; Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Rod MacLeod; Miguel Ruiz-Ramos; Donna M Wilson; Martin Loucka; Agnes Csikos; Yong-Joo Rhee; Joan Teno; Winne Ko; Luc Deliens; Dirk Houttekier
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.871

8.  Using death certificate data to study place of death in 9 European countries: opportunities and weaknesses.

Authors:  Joachim Cohen; Johan Bilsen; Guido Miccinesi; Rurik Löfmark; Julia Addington-Hall; Stein Kaasa; Michael Norup; Gerrit van der Wal; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.