Literature DB >> 8326429

Biomechanics of pin and screw fixation of femoral neck fractures.

C A Holmes1, W T Edwards, E R Myers, D G Lewallen, A A White, W C Hayes.   

Abstract

Using an in vitro cadaveric femoral neck osteotomy model and a paired experimental design, we compared fixation stiffness and yield load for three- and four-pin configurations for both Knowles pins and Asnis screws and for three Asnis screws versus an AO-ASIF sliding hip screw. Repeat measure analyses of variance indicated a significant increase in stiffness (p < 0.05) with the use of three versus four pins; the yield load did not depend significantly on the number of pins. Fixation was significantly stiffer (p < 0.01) and stronger (p = 0.02) for Knowles pins if the osteotomy was oblique rather than transverse to the femoral neck; the opposite was found for Asnis screws. Femoral fixed with hip screws were significantly stiffer (p < 0.01) than the contralateral side fixed with three Asnis screws. No significant difference in yield load was observed, however. Clinically, it appears from these findings that the use of three Asnis screws or three Knowles pins provides modest increases (averaging 4%) in fixation stiffness with no degradation in strength when compared with four screws or pins. Parallel placement of Asnis screws also provides advantages over nonparallel Knowles pins by allowing controlled impaction of the femoral head. While three Asnis screws provide fixation stiffness approximately 40% less than that found with a sliding hip screw, there is no compromise in fixation strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8326429     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199306000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  10 in total

1.  Contemporary management of femoral neck fractures: the young and the old.

Authors:  David A Forsh; Tania A Ferguson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  [Percutaneous screw osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Subtrochanteric fractures as severe complications].

Authors:  H Jansen; S P Frey; R H Meffert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Titanium cable isotonic annular fixation system for the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

Authors:  Zhaofeng Jia; Jiwu Cheng; Haiyan Zhong; Tinghui Xiao; Jinke Ren; Yimiao Lin; Wenjun Huang; Yujie Liang; Qisong Liu; Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Stability of L-shaped and inverted triangle fixation assemblies in treating Pauwels type II femoral neck fracture: a comparative mechanical study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giordano; Roger Pletsch Paes; Danilo Diniz Alves; Arthur Bonfim Amaral; William D Belangero; Marcos Giordano; Anderson Freitas; Hilton A Koch
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-24

5.  Four Screws Diamond Configuration Fixation for Displaced, Comminuted Intracapsular Fracture Neck Femur in Young Adults.

Authors:  Rajesh K Rajnish; Rehan U Haq; Aditya N Aggarwal; Nikhil Verma; Rohit Pandey; Himanshu Bhayana
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Management of femoral neck fractures in young adults.

Authors:  Thuan V Ly; Marc F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Bhava Rj Satish; Atmakuri V Ranganadham; Karruppasamy Ramalingam; Sujit Kumar Tripathy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Does Screw Location Affect the Risk of Subtrochanteric Femur Fracture After Femoral Neck Fixation? A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Erica K Crump; Michael Quacinella; Bradley K Deafenbaugh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Sachin Upadhyay; Haroon Khizir Taqi Raza
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Author's reply.

Authors:  Bhava Rj Satish; Atmakuri V Ranganadham; Karruppasamy Ramalingam; Sujit Kumar Tripathy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.251

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.