Literature DB >> 8326294

Clinical index to predict bacteraemia caused by staphylococci.

L Leibovici1, W R Gransden, S J Eykyn, H Konsiberger, M Drucker, S D Pitlik, I Phillips.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define risk factors associated with bacteraemia caused by Staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci; and to use them to define patients in need of empiric anti-staphylococcal antibiotic treatment.
DESIGN: Derivation set: observational, prospective study; validation set: retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database.
SETTING: Derivation set: Beilinson Medical Centre, Petah Tiqva, Israel--a 900-bed university hospital. Validation set: St Thomas's Hospital, London, UK--an 800-bed teaching hospital.
SUBJECTS: All episodes of bacteraemia detected at Beilinson Medical Centre between March 1988 and September 1990 (derivation set, n = 1410), and at St Thomas's Hospital during 1987-1990 (validation set, n = 1040).
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of staphylococcal bacteraemia in groups of patients defined by the models.
RESULTS: The following factors were associated with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: focus of infection (whether high or low risk), haemodialysis, intravenous drug abuse and infection acquired in the orthopaedic ward. A logistic model was used to divide the derivation set into three groups with percentages of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia of 1.8%, 13.2% and 33.7% (P < 0.0001); and the validation group 2.5%, 18.2% and 53.2% (P < 0.0001). Factors associated with coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteraemia were: central or peripheral intravenous catheter as the focus of infection, a preterm neonate, the presence of a central intravenous catheter, low temperature, and a low white blood cell count. A second model including those factors was used to divide the derivation set into three groups with percentages of coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteraemia of 1.9%, 22.8%, and 43% (P < 0.0001). In the validation set, the percentages were 2.9%, 22.4% and 31.0% (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study defines groups at high risk for staphylococcal bloodstream infection, in which empiric treatment should include an anti-staphylococcal drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8326294     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1993.tb00709.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  5 in total

1.  Two rules for early prediction of bacteremia: testing in a university and a community hospital.

Authors:  Y Yehezkelli; S Subah; G Elhanan; R Raz; A Porter; A Regev; L Leibovici
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Positive blood cultures for coagulase-negative staphylococci in neonates: does highly selective vancomycin usage affect outcome?

Authors:  Y Matrai-Kovalskis; D Greenberg; E S Shinwell; D Fraser; R Dagan
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood cultures by real-time fluorescence PCR.

Authors:  T Y Tan; S Corden; R Barnes; B Cookson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Thrombocytopenia in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: risk factors and prognostic importance.

Authors:  Anat Gafter-Gvili; Nariman Mansur; Assaf Bivas; Noa Zemer-Wassercug; Jihad Bishara; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 5.  Bacteraemia in the very old. Features and treatment.

Authors:  L Leibovici
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.