Literature DB >> 8325117

Detection of deep venous thrombosis by magnetic resonance imaging.

C E Spritzer1, J J Norconk, H D Sostman, R E Coleman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of gradient recalled echo magnetic resonance imaging in assessing deep venous thrombosis.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of a prospective clinical experience in 216 consecutive patients studied using gradient recalled echo magnetic resonance imaging. Sixteen patients were unavailable for follow-up and 1 study was technically suboptimal, leaving 199 studies as the basis of this report.
RESULTS: In 79 cases with confirmatory venography (n = 54), ultrasound (n = 16, thigh veins only), or computed tomography (n = 9, pelvic veins only), magnetic resonance imaging was 97 percent sensitive, 95 percent specific, and 96 percent accurate. Including cases that were normal by magnetic resonance imaging, not anticoagulated, and with uneventful follow-up as true normal cases, the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging were as follows: 97 percent, 98 percent, and 97 percent.
CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging, using gradient recalled echo acquisitions, is capable of accurately diagnosing acute deep venous thrombosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8325117     DOI: 10.1378/chest.104.1.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  9 in total

Review 1.  Spiral computed tomographic scanning and magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  P A Grenier; C Beigelman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Advances in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism a multimodal approach.

Authors:  S D Chunilal; J S Ginsberg
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  The accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of suspected deep vein thrombosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fiona C Sampson; Steve W Goodacre; Steven M Thomas; Edwin J R van Beek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Investigation of suspected lower limb venous thrombosis.

Authors:  G R Sissons
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Diagnosing pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  K M Moser
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-10

7.  The role of ultrasonography in thromboembolic disease management in the orthopaedic patient.

Authors:  W J Ciccone; J S Reid; V D Pellegrini
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1999

Review 8.  Advanced imaging in acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Gita Yashwantrao Karande; Sandeep S Hedgire; Yadiel Sanchez; Vinit Baliyan; Vishala Mishra; Suvranu Ganguli; Anand M Prabhakar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

Review 9.  Peripheral vascular disease assessment in the lower limb: a review of current and emerging non-invasive diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Elham Shabani Varaki; Gaetano D Gargiulo; Stefania Penkala; Paul P Breen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.