Literature DB >> 8324164

Optimal methods for identifying Clostridium difficile infections.

D N Gerding1, J S Brazier.   

Abstract

The major controversy in the diagnosis of symptomatic gastrointestinal infection due to Clostridium difficile is whether laboratory evidence of the C. difficile organism in culture is sufficient or if evidence of one of the C. difficile toxins in stool should be required. Cultures performed properly on selective media currently are the most sensitive method for detection of C. difficile, whereas the cell cytotoxin assay for detection of toxin B is the most specific. Stool specimens from patients with clinical diarrhea are sometimes found to be culture-positive for C. difficile but assay-negative for cytotoxin. Samples from these patients can be viewed as false-positive by culture or false-negative by cytotoxin test. Evidence from endoscopy indicates that some patients whose stool is culture-positive for the organism but assay-negative for toxin do have pseudomembranous colitis, but its incidence among such patients (11%) is lower than that among patients whose stool is culture- and assay-positive (51%). Response to treatment with vancomycin or metronidazole is similar in the two groups of patients, and withholding treatment from patients whose stool contains C. difficile but not cytotoxin may result in increased morbidity and mortality. Up to one-third of C. difficile organisms from stool specimens that are culture-positive but assay-negative are incapable of producing cytotoxin in vitro, a finding that suggests these organisms may not be the cause of diarrhea.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8324164     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/16.supplement_4.s439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  9 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  John Starr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-03

2.  Infectious disease physicians rate microbiology services and practices.

Authors:  E J Baron; D Francis; K M Peddecord
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stools.

Authors:  F Barbut; R Revel; R Ephraim; P Leluan; P Lureau; J C Petit
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  The impact of ICD-9-CM code rank order on the estimated prevalence of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Anne M Butler; Humaa A Nyazee; Kimberly A Reske; Deborah S Yokoe; Jeanmarie Mayer; Julie E Mangino; Yosef M Khan; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Intrarectal instillation of Clostridium difficile toxin A triggers colonic inflammation and tissue damage: development of a novel and efficient mouse model of Clostridium difficile toxin exposure.

Authors:  Simon A Hirota; Vadim Iablokov; Sarah E Tulk; L Patrick Schenck; Helen Becker; Jimmie Nguyen; Samir Al Bashir; Tanis C Dingle; Austin Laing; Jianrui Liu; Yan Li; Jeff Bolstad; George L Mulvey; Glen D Armstrong; Wallace K MacNaughton; Daniel A Muruve; Justin A MacDonald; Paul L Beck
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Rapid detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal samples by magnetic immuno PCR assay.

Authors:  M J Wolfhagen; A C Fluit; R Torensma; M J Poppelier; J Verhoef
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Pneumatosis intestinalis in a child with AIDS and pseudomembranous colitis.

Authors:  E M Burton; M G Mercado-Deane; K Patel
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994

8.  Indications and Relative Utility of Lower Endoscopy in the Management of Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Nora E Burkart; Mary R Kwaan; Christopher Shepela; Robert D Madoff; Yan Wang; David A Rothenberger; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Martina Neuendorf; Raquel Guadarrama-Gonzalez; Birgit Lamik; Colin R MacKenzie
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.605

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.