Literature DB >> 8322032

Diagnosis and classification of schizophrenia.

N C Andreasen1, W T Carpenter.   

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a clinical syndrome of both extraordinary importance and extraordinary complexity. Its conceptual history contains many perspectives on the "essential" nature of the illness. For example, Kraepelin in 1919 emphasized primarily onset and course, although he also stressed the importance of some symptoms such as changes in affect and volition. Bleuler in 1911 took a more cross-sectional approach and attempted to identify fundamental characteristic symptoms, especially stressing fragmenting of thought processes. Schneider's (1959) approach was cross-sectional, stressing a group of "first-rank symptoms." DSM-III and its successors attempted to achieve a synthesis of these concepts. Nevertheless, heterogeneity in the clinical presentation of schizophrenia is certain, and heterogeneity in pathophysiology and etiology is likely. Although we can now define a particular construct of schizophrenia with reasonable agreement, the construct must be recognized as provisional and based on a need to achieve consensus about definitions rather than on an understanding of pathophysiology and etiology. The major challenge confronting the student of schizophrenia is to identify its mechanisms and causes in order to develop improved strategies for treatment and prevention. Several different approaches have been proposed to achieve this goal. Early attempts to explore and validate the construct of schizophrenia stressed descriptive and epidemiological techniques; the "validity" of a given construct of schizophrenia would be determined by evaluation of familial aggregation, course and outcome, response to treatment, and laboratory tests. This earlier approach to validation is now complemented by one that draws on techniques from neuroscience and attempts to understand schizophrenia in terms of underlying neural mechanisms. While the earlier approach conceptualized schizophrenia primarily in terms of a single disease entity, the second approach is particularly useful for the exploration of subtypes or dimensions. Research strategies for the study of schizophrenia have been developed to explore its heterogeneity. Three different competing models are discussed: (1) A single etiopathological process leading to diverse manifestations, similar to multiple sclerosis; (2) multiple disease entities leading to schizophrenia by different etiopathological processes, similar to the syndrome of mental retardation; and (3) specific symptom clusters within schizophrenia reflecting different disease processes that come together in different ways in different patients. Each of these models has strengths and weaknesses for the identification of etiology and pathophysiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8322032     DOI: 10.1093/schbul/19.2.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  30 in total

1.  Psychopharmacogenetics and psychiatric genetics: similar methodological challenges.

Authors:  M Maziade; M A Roy; C Mérette; L Bissonnette; R Quirion; R Palmour
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Avolition and expressive deficits capture negative symptom phenomenology: implications for DSM-5 and schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Julie W Messinger; Fabien Trémeau; Daniel Antonius; Erika Mendelsohn; Vasthie Prudent; Arielle D Stanford; Dolores Malaspina
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-09-18

3.  A comparison of clinical and research DSM-III-R diagnoses of schizophrenia in a Finnish national birth cohort. Clinical and research diagnoses of schizophrenia.

Authors:  M Isohanni; T Mäkikyrö; J Moring; P Räsänen; H Hakko; U Partanen; M Koiranen; P Jones
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  The concept of psychosis: historical and phenomenological aspects.

Authors:  Martin Bürgy
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  [The history and phenomenology of the concept of psychosis. A perspective of the Heidelberg school (1913-2008)].

Authors:  M Bürgy
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Chromosome 13q13-q14 locus overlaps mood and psychotic disorders: the relevance for redefining phenotype.

Authors:  Michel Maziade; Yvon C Chagnon; Marc-André Roy; Alexandre Bureau; Alain Fournier; Chantal Mérette
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Genetics of clinical features and subtypes of schizophrenia: a review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Ayman H Fanous; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  A neurobehavioral systems analysis of adult rats exposed to methylazoxymethanol acetate on E17: implications for the neuropathology of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Holly Moore; J David Jentsch; Mehdi Ghajarnia; Mark A Geyer; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Dyskinesia and parkinsonism in antipsychotic-naive patients with schizophrenia, first-degree relatives and healthy controls: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeroen P F Koning; Diederik E Tenback; Jim van Os; André Aleman; René S Kahn; Peter N van Harten
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Anhedonia and ambivalence in schizophrenic patients with fronto-cerebellar metabolic abnormalities: a fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Kyung-Min Park; Jae-Jin Kim; Jeong Ho Seok; Ji Won Chun; Hae-Jeong Park; Jong Doo Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.