Literature DB >> 8321317

Chaos reduces species extinction by amplifying local population noise.

J C Allen1, W M Schaffer, D Rosko.   

Abstract

In the mid-1970s, theoretical ecologists were responsible for stimulating interest in nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Ironically, the importance of chaos in ecology itself remains controversial. Proponents of ecological chaos point to its ubiquity in mathematical models and to various empirical findings. Sceptics maintain that the models are unrealistic and that the experimental evidence is equally consistent with stochastic models. More generally, it has been argued that interdemic selection and/or enhanced rates of species extinction will eliminate populations and species that evolve into chaotic regions of parameter space. Fundamental to this opinion is the belief that violent oscillations and low minimum population densities are inevitable correlates of the chaotic state. In fact, rarity is not a necessary consequence of complex dynamical behaviour. But even when chaos is associated with frequent rarity, its consequences to survival are necessarily deleterious only in the case of species composed of a single population. Of course, the majority of real world species (for example, most insects) consist of multiple populations weakly coupled by migration, and in this circumstance chaos can actually reduce the probability of extinction. Here we show that although low densities lead to more frequent extinction at the local level, the decorrelating effect of chaotic oscillations reduces the degree of synchrony among populations and thus the likelihood that all are simultaneously extinguished.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8321317     DOI: 10.1038/364229a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  34 in total

Review 1.  Chaos and regular dynamics in model multi-habitat plankton-fish communities.

Authors:  A B Medvinsky; S V Petrovskii; I A Tikhonova; E Venturino; H Malchow
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Unexpected coherence and conservation.

Authors:  B Cazelles; S Bottani; L Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Bifurcations and chaos in a predator-prey system with the Allee effect.

Authors:  Andrew Morozov; Sergei Petrovskii; Bai-Lian Li
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Density dependence: an ecological Tower of Babel.

Authors:  Salvador Herrando-Pérez; Steven Delean; Barry W Brook; Corey J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Density-regulated population dynamics and conditional dispersal alter the fate of mutations occurring at the front of an expanding population.

Authors:  T Münkemüller; M J Travis; O J Burton; K Schiffers; K Johst
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Chaotic Red Queen coevolution in three-species food chains.

Authors:  Fabio Dercole; Regis Ferriere; Sergio Rinaldi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Strong seasonality produces spatial asynchrony in the outbreak of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Scott M Duke-Sylvester; Luca Bolzoni; Leslie A Real
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Cluster formation in a heterogeneous metapopulation model.

Authors:  Jacques A L Silva
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Are bark beetle outbreaks less synchronous than forest Lepidoptera outbreaks?

Authors:  Bjørn Økland; Andrew M Liebhold; Ottar N Bjørnstad; Nadir Erbilgin; Paal Krokene
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Environment, but not migration rate, influences extinction risk in experimental metapopulations.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen; John M Drake
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.