Literature DB >> 8321229

Evidence from mutation spectra that the UV hypermutability of xeroderma pigmentosum variant cells reflects abnormal, error-prone replication on a template containing photoproducts.

Y C Wang1, V M Maher, D L Mitchell, J J McCormick.   

Abstract

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) variant patients are genetically predisposed to sunlight-induced skin cancer. Fibroblasts derived from these patients are extremely sensitive to the mutagenic effect of UV radiation and are abnormally slow in replicating DNA containing UV-induced photoproducts. However, unlike cells from the majority of XP patients, XP variant cells have a normal or nearly normal rate of nucleotide excision repair of such damage. To determine whether their UV hypermutability reflected a slower rate of excision of photoproducts specifically during early S phase when the target gene for mutations, i.e., the hypoxanthine (guanine) phosphoribosyltransferase gene (HPRT), is replicated, we synchronized diploid populations of normal and XP variant fibroblasts, irradiated them in early S phase, and compared the rate of loss of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 pyrimidine-pyrimidones from DNA during S phase. There was no difference. Both removed 94% of the 6-4 pyrimidine-pyrimidones within 8 h and 40% of the dimers within 11 h. There was also no difference between the two cell lines in the rate of repair during G1 phase. To determine whether the hypermutability resulted from abnormal error-prone replication of DNA containing photoproducts, we determined the spectra of mutations induced in the coding region of the HPRT gene of XP variant cells irradiated in early S and G1 phases and compared with those found in normal cells. The majority of the mutations in both types of cells were base substitutions, but the two types of cells differed significantly from each other in the kinds of substitutions, but the two types differed significantly from each other in the kinds of substitutions observed either in mutants from S phase (P < 0.01) or from G1 phase (P = 0.03). In the variant cells, the substitutions were mainly transversions (58% in S, 73% in G1). In the normal cells irradiated in S, the majority of the substitutions were G.C --> A.T, and most involved CC photoproducts in the transcribed strand. In the variant cells irradiated in S, substitutions involving cytosine in the transcribed strand were G.C --> T.A transversions exclusively. G.C --> A.T transitions made up a much smaller fraction of the substitutions than in normal cells (P < 0.02), and all of them involved photoproducts located in the nontranscribed strand. The data strongly suggest that XP variant cells are much less likely than normal cells to incorporate either dAMP or dGMP opposite the pyrimidines involved in photoproducts. This would account for their significantly higher frequency of mutants and might explain their abnormal delay in replicating a UV-damaged template.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8321229      PMCID: PMC359977          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.4276-4283.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  32 in total

1.  Postreplication repair: questions of its definition and possible alteration in xeroderma pigmentosum cell strains.

Authors:  S D Park; J E Cleaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Xeroderma pigmentosum. An inherited diseases with sun sensitivity, multiple cutaneous neoplasms, and abnormal DNA repair.

Authors:  J H Robbins; K H Kraemer; M A Lutzner; B W Festoff; H G Coon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Mechanisms of inhibition of DNA replication by ultraviolet light in normal human and xeroderma pigmentosum fibroblasts.

Authors:  W K Kaufmann; J E Cleaver
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1981-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Repair of UV-endonuclease-susceptible sites in the 7 complementation groups of xeroderma pigmentosum A through G.

Authors:  B Zelle; P H Lohman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Ultraviolet mutagenesis of normal and xeroderma pigmentosum variant human fibroblasts.

Authors:  B C Myhr; D Turnbull; J A DiPaolo
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Xeroderma pigmentosum variants have a slow recovery of DNA synthesis after irradiation with ultraviolet light.

Authors:  J E Cleaver; G H Thomas; S D Park
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1979-08-29

7.  Extent of excision repair before DNA synthesis determines the mutagenic but not the lethal effect of UV radiation.

Authors:  B Konze-Thomas; R M Hazard; V M Maher; J J McCormick
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Failure of RNA synthesis to recover after UV irradiation: an early defect in cells from individuals with Cockayne's syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum.

Authors:  L V Mayne; A R Lehmann
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  In vitro bypass of UV-induced lesions by Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I: specificity of nucleotide incorporation.

Authors:  S D Rabkin; P D Moore; B S Strauss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Xeroderma pigmentosum cells with normal levels of excision repair have a defect in DNA synthesis after UV-irradiation.

Authors:  A R Lehmann; S Kirk-Bell; C F Arlett; M C Paterson; P H Lohman; E A de Weerd-Kastelein; D Bootsma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  48 in total

1.  Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP-V) correcting protein from HeLa cells has a thymine dimer bypass DNA polymerase activity.

Authors:  C Masutani; M Araki; A Yamada; R Kusumoto; T Nogimori; T Maekawa; S Iwai; F Hanaoka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Bridging the gap: a family of novel DNA polymerases that replicate faulty DNA.

Authors:  R E Johnson; M T Washington; S Prakash; L Prakash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Role of DNA polymerase eta in the bypass of a (6-4) TT photoproduct.

Authors:  R E Johnson; L Haracska; S Prakash; L Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Mechanism of nucleotide incorporation opposite a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  M Todd Washington; Louise Prakash; Satya Prakash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Requirement of Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding for DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  M Todd Washington; Sandra A Helquist; Eric T Kool; Louise Prakash; Satya Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  E2F1 localizes to sites of UV-induced DNA damage to enhance nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Ruifeng Guo; Jie Chen; Feng Zhu; Anup K Biswas; Thomas R Berton; David L Mitchell; David G Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Distinct mechanisms of cis-syn thymine dimer bypass by Dpo4 and DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  Robert E Johnson; Louise Prakash; Satya Prakash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Participation of mouse DNA polymerase iota in strand-biased mutagenic bypass of UV photoproducts and suppression of skin cancer.

Authors:  Chad A Dumstorf; Alan B Clark; Qingcong Lin; Grace E Kissling; Tao Yuan; Raju Kucherlapati; W Glenn McGregor; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Acceleration of 5-methylcytosine deamination in cyclobutane dimers by G and its implications for UV-induced C-to-T mutation hotspots.

Authors:  Vincent J Cannistraro; John-Stephen Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  p53 suppression overwhelms DNA polymerase eta deficiency in determining the cellular UV DNA damage response.

Authors:  Rebecca R Laposa; Luzviminda Feeney; Eileen Crowley; Sebastien de Feraudy; James E Cleaver
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.