Literature DB >> 8318442

Are anticipatory first and second interval skin conductance responses indicators of predicted aversiveness?

J Wolter1, H Lachnit.   

Abstract

The experiment reviewed here was an attempt to examine whether or not magnitudes of first and second interval skin conductance responses (FIR, SIR) to different conditioned stimuli (CS), each predicting another unconditioned stimulus (US), mirror the aversiveness of the predicted USs. Twenty human subjects received a differential Pavlovian conditioning training with five CSs, each one paired eight times with a specific US. Magnitudes of FIR and SIR elicited by CSs increased with increasing aversiveness of the USs predicted. It is concluded therefore that the SIR is not a mere indicator of a cognitive expectancy process but is also affected by emotional aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8318442     DOI: 10.1007/bf02691221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci        ISSN: 1053-881X


  5 in total

1.  Orienting responses and conditioning of electrodermal responses.

Authors:  J A Stern; L C Walrath
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Orienting reactions, expectancy learning, and conditioned responses in electrodermal conditioning with different interstimulus intervals.

Authors:  A Ohman
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Effect of explicit trial-by-trial information about shock probability in long interstimulus interval GSR conditioning.

Authors:  A Ohman; P A Björkstrand; P E Ellström
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-04

4.  Range correction applied to heart rate and to GSR data.

Authors:  D T Lykken
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Interaction between instruction-induced expectancy and strength of unconditioned stimulus in GSR conditioning.

Authors:  A Ohman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06
  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans.

Authors:  David C Knight; Hanh T Nguyen; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Blockade of endogenous opioid neurotransmission enhances acquisition of conditioned fear in humans.

Authors:  Falk Eippert; Ulrike Bingel; Eszter Schoell; Juliana Yacubian; Christian Büchel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Amygdala and hippocampal activity during acquisition and extinction of human fear conditioning.

Authors:  David C Knight; Christine N Smith; Dominic T Cheng; Elliot A Stein; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Expression of conditional fear with and without awareness.

Authors:  David C Knight; Hanh T Nguyen; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Activity in the human amygdala corresponds to early, rather than late period autonomic responses to a signal for shock.

Authors:  Dominic T Cheng; Jennifer Richards; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Indicators of early and late processing reveal the importance of within-trial-time for theories of associative learning.

Authors:  Harald Lachnit; Anna Thorwart; Holger Schultheis; Anja Lotz; Stephan Koenig; Metin Uengoer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Pain-relief learning in flies, rats, and man: basic research and applied perspectives.

Authors:  Bertram Gerber; Ayse Yarali; Sören Diegelmann; Carsten T Wotjak; Paul Pauli; Markus Fendt
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 2.460

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.