Literature DB >> 8317777

Legal liability and managed care.

P S Appelbaum1.   

Abstract

In attempts to reduce the cost of mental health treatment, health insurers are turning to mechanisms for intensive oversight that fall under the rubric of managed care. These approaches have implications for the potential liability of clinicians and managed care entities. Clinicians may be confronted with legal duties to appeal adverse decisions, to disclose the impact of managed care on patients' treatment, and in some circumstances, to continue treatment after payment has been denied. Managed care entities are being held to duties to conduct review in a reasonable fashion, and may also have a duty to disclose the limitations managed care may place on patients' access to treatment, and to select appropriate providers of care. The law in this area is in an early stage of development and is likely to be refined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8317777     DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.48.3.251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  5 in total

1.  Ethics, managed care, and outpatient psychotherapy.

Authors:  Marsha Wineburgh
Journal:  Clin Soc Work J       Date:  1998

2.  Clinicians as advocates: an exploratory study of responses to managed care by mental health professionals.

Authors:  Nancy Wolff; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Professional development: mine and theirs.

Authors:  J D Ball
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2010-12

4.  Managed mental health care: conflicts of interest in the provider/client relationship.

Authors:  P Backlar
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1996-04

Review 5.  A behavioral prescription for promoting applied behavior analysis within pediatrics.

Authors:  K D Allen; V J Barone; B R Kuhn
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.