Literature DB >> 8317753

Adequacy of general anesthesia for cesarean section.

H King1, S Ashley, D Brathwaite, J Decayette, D J Wooten.   

Abstract

To assess the adequacy of the general anesthesia commonly employed for Cesarean section, we used isolated forearm technique to study 30 parturients (physical status ASA I/II, aged 17-35 yr) scheduled for nonemergent abdominal delivery. Anesthesia was induced with intravenous thiopental (3 mg/kg, 250 mg maximum) and succinylcholine (1.5 mg/kg), and then proceeded with a mixture of 50% N2O, 50% O2, and 0.5% halothane at a flow of 5 L/min and end-tidal CO2 at 40 mm Hg. Paralysis was maintained with a 0.1% succinylcholine infusion. When eyelash reflex disappeared, patients received taped instruction via headphones at 1-min intervals for 10 min. The tapes instructed patients to flex fingers if they were able to hear, to make a fist or squeeze the investigator's hand if they felt pain, to remember six target words, and to respond with specific physical signals during later interviews. Three sets of tapes assigned at random were used in the study. For signs of inadequate anesthesia, other variables such as eye centering, pupil size, sweating, and lacrimation were concomitantly monitored at the time of induction, laryngoscopy/intubation, and skin incision, and then at 1-min intervals for 10 min. Brain activity was also monitored by means of computerized aperiodic analysis of electroencephalogram Lifescan). Patients were interviewed in the postanesthesia recovery room and again 24 h later. At the time of skin incision, 96.7% of patients (29/30) signaled awareness by flexing fingers, 86.7% (26/30) exhibited lacrimation, and 80% (24/30) made a fist or squeezed the investigator's hand, indicating pain perception.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8317753     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199307000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  3 in total

Review 1.  Unresponsiveness ≠ unconsciousness.

Authors:  Robert D Sanders; Giulio Tononi; Steven Laureys; Jamie W Sleigh
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Neurological and psychiatric adverse effects of anaesthetics: epidemiology and treatment.

Authors:  J M Klafta; J P Zacny; C J Young
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Tracheal Intubation through the I-gel for Emergency Cesarean Section in a Patient with Multidrug Hypersensitivity: A New Technique.

Authors:  Kartika Balaji Samala; Yuri Uchiyama; Yasuyuki Tokinaga; Yukitoshi Niiyama; Soshi Iwasaki; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-07-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.