Literature DB >> 8315626

NHS provision for the treatment of ankle fractures: a patient satisfaction study.

P Meredith1, N R Gillham.   

Abstract

From a clinical audit of the treatment given to 1005 patients suffering from ankle fractures, 507 patients of 626 taken randomly from 15 hospitals were contacted and asked to complete a questionnaire describing and evaluating their experiences. The design of the study aimed in a number of ways to reduce respondents' tendency towards a positive response in completing satisfaction scales. The very high response rate, commentaries and variations in opinions about specific service criteria indicate that the results have a high degree of validity. The generally high rates of satisfaction reported here reflect very well on existing NHS provision for a specific procedure, with the exception of certain hospitals' arrangements for waiting, and the provision of certain types of information. Against general indicators of satisfaction with the management of pain relief in hospitals, that in ankle fracture treatments appears to be exceptionally high. However, it would be valuable to discover why younger patients appear to be strikingly more critical than older patients across the entire range of issues. The inquiry aims to compare findings with studies of other orthopaedic services using a similar elementary methodology as a routine component of clinical audit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8315626      PMCID: PMC1294482          DOI: 10.1177/014107689308600609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  5 in total

1.  Proof of the pudding. CASPE's patient satisfaction system.

Authors:  I Wickings; J Crown; J Harvey; A Kerruish
Journal:  Health Serv J       Date:  1989-08-31

2.  Audit and the quality of clinical care: patient satisfaction.

Authors:  P Meredith
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Satisfaction with medical care: its measurement and relation to utilization.

Authors:  K J Roghmann; A Hengst; T R Zastowny
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Patients' satisfaction and reported acceptance of advice in general practice.

Authors:  J Kincey; P Bradshaw; P Ley
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1975-08

5.  Patient satisfaction survey instrument for use in health maintenance organizations.

Authors:  B D Weiss; J H Senf
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.983

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Improvement of patient satisfaction with the neurosurgery service at a large tertiary care, London-based hospital.

Authors:  Amad Khan; Mohammad Naushad Chaudhry; Salema Khalid; Dipankar Nandi
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2014-06-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.