Literature DB >> 8314761

Escherichia coli transcription termination factor rho. II. Binding of oligonucleotide cofactors.

Y Wang1, P H von Hippel.   

Abstract

The relative binding affinities for rho of the oligonucleotide rho ATPase cofactors studied in the accompanying paper (Wang, Y., and von Hippel, P. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13940-13946) have been determined by gel mobility shift and ultrafiltration binding analyses. We find that each rho hexamer carries three strong and three weak RNA-binding sites that differ approximately 10-fold in their affinities for oligonucleotide cofactors. Furthermore, in contrast to the sequence dependence of ATPase activation, we find that the binding affinities of these oligonucleotide cofactors for rho depend only on their cytosine content. In addition, we show that changes in the positions of rU residues in the oligo(rU,rC) cofactors (which significantly modulate the ATPase activity of rho) have no effect on binding affinities and that the addition of ATP, ADP, or the nonhydrolyzable ATP analog adenosine 5'-(beta,gamma-methylene)triphosphate also does not change the binding affinities of the oligonucleotide cofactors for rho. Considered in the context of the coupling of the rho ATPase and RNA binding and release cycles, these results suggest that rC residues are required for the formation of stable rho-RNA complexes, whereas rU residues at the 5' termini of cofactors bound to rho initiate or facilitate the release of the RNA from the individual cofactor site as a consequence of ATP hydrolysis. Thus, both the tightness of the binding of RNA segments to the individual RNA-binding sites of rho and the rate of release of these segments from these sites are critical in controlling the ATPase rate of rho and probably also in modulating the function of this protein in transcript termination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8314761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  8 in total

Review 1.  Nucleic acid recognition by OB-fold proteins.

Authors:  Douglas L Theobald; Rachel M Mitton-Fry; Deborah S Wuttke
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2003-02-18

2.  Low selection pressure aids the evolution of cooperative ribozyme mutations in cells.

Authors:  Zhaleh N Amini; Ulrich F Müller
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A physical model for the translocation and helicase activities of Escherichia coli transcription termination protein Rho.

Authors:  J Geiselmann; Y Wang; S E Seifried; P H von Hippel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  1H, 15N and 13C resonance assignments and secondary structure determination of the RNA-binding domain of E.coli rho protein.

Authors:  D M Briercheck; T J Allison; J P Richardson; J F Ellena; T C Wood; G S Rule
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  ADP but not P(i) dissociation contributes to rate limitation for Escherichia coli Rho.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Barbara L Stitt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Rho-dependent transcription termination: more questions than answers.

Authors:  Sharmistha Banerjee; Jisha Chalissery; Irfan Bandey; Ranjan Sen
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.422

7.  Functional proteins from a random-sequence library.

Authors:  A D Keefe; J W Szostak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  In vivo evolution of a catalytic RNA couples trans-splicing to translation.

Authors:  Karen E Olson; Gregory F Dolan; Ulrich F Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.