Literature DB >> 8314295

[Laparoscopic appendectomy as a routine procedure].

A Putz1, R Bogesits, W Müller, C Werner.   

Abstract

At the Gynaecology Department of the Bethesda Hospital, 100 patients undergoing a laparoscopic appendectomy were recruited for a prospective study. The first ten patients received no antibiotic, the second ten were given a three-day course of cephazolin, the third ten were treated with a combination of sulbactam and ampicillin and the remaining 70 received cefuroxime. There were no significant differences between the four groups in the mean operating time, the intraoperative complication rate or in the degree of inflammation as classified by the histological examination. The reduced rate of postoperative complications defined as pyrexia > 38 degrees C, elevated WBC and peritoneal irritation for more than two days, showed the advantage of antibiotic prophylaxis with cefuroxime with respect to single parameters and overall complication rates. There were no intraoperative or severe postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8314295     DOI: 10.1007/bf01710345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  10 in total

1.  [Late sequelae of appendectomy with special reference to adhesions in the lower abdomen, chronic abdominal pain and sterility].

Authors:  H H Riedel; G M Haag
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1989

2.  [From diagnostic laparoscopy to laparoscopic surgery].

Authors:  C Klaiber; A Metzger; K Z'graggen; H Leepin
Journal:  Helv Chir Acta       Date:  1991-02

3.  [Surgical technique of laparoscopic appendectomy].

Authors:  H Leepin; C Klaiber; A Metzger; K Z'graggen
Journal:  Helv Chir Acta       Date:  1991-07

4.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy. Indications, technique and results in 653 patients].

Authors:  F Götz; A Pier; C Bacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery. A report on 388 operations.

Authors:  F Götz; A Pier; C Bacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  L Engström; G Fenyö
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendectomy.

Authors:  D Street; B I Bodai; L J Owens; D B Moore; C B Walton; J W Holcroft
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-06

8.  [Pelviscopic appendectomy].

Authors:  K Semm
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1988-01-08       Impact factor: 0.628

9.  [Preventive appendectomy in gynecologic surgery. Report of 1,718 cases].

Authors:  H A Krone; E Sperke
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Early experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in women.

Authors:  J H Schreiber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.