Literature DB >> 8313361

Immunogenicity in rabbits and mice of an antibody-chelate conjugate: comparison of (S) and (R) macrocyclic enantiomers and an acyclic chelating agent.

N Watanabe1, D A Goodwin, C F Meares, M McTigue, W Chaovapong, C M Ransone, O Renn.   

Abstract

The macrocyclic bifunctional chelating agent 2-(p-bromoacetamidobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecanetetraa cetic acid (BAD), forms inert metal complexes ideal for radioimmunotherapy. Kosmas et al. (Cancer Res., 52: 904-911, 1992) found 2-imminothiolane linker-(S)-BAD monoclonal antibody HMFG1 highly immunogenic in patients. We studied the immunogenicity of (S) and (R) enantiomers of 2-imminothiolane linker-BAD rabbit IgG, monoclonal antibody Lym-1, and Lym-1 2-imminothiolane linker-(S)-bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA in 15 rabbits. Five groups of three each were given 0.1, 1.0, or 10 mg of 111In conjugate i.v., blood samples were taken daily for 14 days and biweekly for 70 days, and the plasma T1/2 was calculated. A drop in plasma 111In at 6-8 days coincided with the appearance of antibody on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Specific anti-(S)-BAD, anti-(R)-BAD, anti-(S)-bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA, and anti-mouse IgG were measured. Rabbit IgG conjugates did not elicit an immune response. Mouse IgG conjugates were immunogenic on the first exposure, with both anti-1,4,7,10-tetraazacylododecane N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid and anti-mouse responses. Anti-1,4,7,10-tetraazacylododecane N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid was specific for the (S) or (R) enantiomer, but cross-reaction appeared with reboosting. A second injection of the opposite enantiomer gave a response to that enantiomer. Lym-1 bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA produced anti-bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA and anti-mouse response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8313361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  5 in total

1.  A dual CT-MR dendrimer contrast agent as a surrogate marker for convection-enhanced delivery of intracerebral macromolecular therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Celeste Aida S Regino; Stuart Walbridge; Marcelino Bernardo; Karen J Wong; Dennis Johnson; Russell Lonser; Edward H Oldfield; Peter L Choyke; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Bispecific Her2 × cotinine antibody in combination with cotinine-(histidine)2-iodine for the pre-targeting of Her2-positive breast cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Soomin Yoon; Yun-Hee Kim; Se Hun Kang; Seok-Ki Kim; Hwa Kyoung Lee; Hyori Kim; Junho Chung; In-Hoo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Problems of delivery of monoclonal antibodies. Pharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic solutions.

Authors:  R M Reilly; J Sandhu; T M Alvarez-Diez; S Gallinger; J Kirsh; H Stern
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Preparation and preclinical evaluation of humanised A33 immunoconjugates for radioimmunotherapy.

Authors:  D J King; P Antoniw; R J Owens; J R Adair; A M Haines; A P Farnsworth; H Finney; A D Lawson; A Lyons; T S Baker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  In vitro and in vivo application of anti-cotinine antibody and cotinine-conjugated compounds.

Authors:  Hyori Kim; Soomin Yoon; Junho Chung
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.778

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.