Literature DB >> 8313288

Midwifery defined by physicians, nurses and midwives: the birth of a consensus?

R Blais1, B Maheux, J Lambert, J Loiselle, N Gauthier, A Framarin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the form of midwifery practice preferred by physicians practising obstetrics, nurses providing maternity care and midwives.
DESIGN: Mail survey conducted in 1991.
SETTING: Province of Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: A systematic random sample of 844 physicians, 808 nurses and 92 midwives; 597, 723 and 92 respectively completed the questionnaire, for an overall response rate of 80%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Midwife training options, range of responsibilities, location of midwifery care, relationship to other maternity care providers and degree of autonomy.
RESULTS: Most of the physicians, nurses and midwives surveyed agreed that if midwifery was legalized, midwives should have a university degree, provide basic care to women with normal pregnancy and delivery, provide prenatal and postnatal care in hospitals and community health centres, perform delivery in hospitals and work in close collaboration with the other maternity care professionals. Disagreement existed concerning the level of university training required, the need for training in nursing first, the scope of medical intervention performed by midwives, out-of-hospital delivery, the autonomy of midwives and control over their practice.
CONCLUSION: Some consensus on midwifery practice exists between physicians, nurses and midwives. In jurisdictions where opposition to midwives is strong, such consensus could serve as the starting point for the introduction of midwifery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8313288      PMCID: PMC1486358     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  3 in total

1.  The introduction of midwifery in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  K J Kaufman
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Despite CMA misgivings, support for midwifery appears to be growing.

Authors:  E LeBourdais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Legalization of midwifery and the issue of home births.

Authors:  C McCourt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Birth Care Providers' Experiences and Practices in a Brazilian Alongside Midwifery Unit: An Ethnographic Study.

Authors:  Michelly Christiny M Nunes; Luciana M Reberte Gouveia; Jessica Reis-Queiroz; Luiza A K Hoga
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2016-09-28

2.  Barriers and facilitators related to implementation of regulated midwifery in Manitoba: a case study.

Authors:  Kellie Thiessen; Maureen Heaman; Javier Mignone; Patricia Martens; Kristine Robinson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.