Literature DB >> 8312239

Comparison of the ileal and faecal digestibility of dietary amino acids in adult humans and evaluation of the pig as a model animal for digestion studies in man.

A M Rowan1, P J Moughan, M N Wilson, K Maher, C Tasman-Jones.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine if there is a difference between ileal and faecal assays for determining amino acid and N digestibilities in adult human subjects. Comparison of true ileal amino acid and N digestibilities was also made between adult human subjects and growing pigs to establish the usefulness of the pig as a model animal. Five subjects with established ileostomies and six subjects with intact large bowels consumed a constant diet consisting of meat, vegetables, fruit, bread and dairy products for 7 d with collection of ileostomy contents or faeces respectively over the last 4 d. The study was repeated using 25 kg body weight ileostomized and intact pigs. Apparent amino acid and N digestibility coefficients were determined. For human subjects the faecal digestibility values were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the ileal values for Arg, Asp, Gly, Phe, Pro, Ser, Thr and Trp. The faecal digestibility of Met was significantly lower than the ileal value. Determination of DNA, diaminopimelic acid (DAPA) and the digestibilities of pectin, hemicellulose and cellulose in human subjects indicated that some microbial colonization had occurred at the terminal ileum after formation of an ileostomy; however, this was not as extensive as in the large intestine. True ileum amino acid and N digestibilities were calculated after correcting for the endogenous contribution of amino acids at the terminal ileum determined using a protein-free diet. There were no significant differences between adult human subjects and pigs for true ileal dietary amino acid digestibility except for Thr, Phe, Cys and Met. There were no significant differences between adult humans and pigs for the ileal digestibility of dry matter and the faecal digestibility of gross energy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8312239     DOI: 10.1079/bjn19940108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  19 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying the contribution of dietary protein to whole body protein kinetics: examination of the intrinsically labeled proteins method.

Authors:  Robert R Wolfe; Sanghee Park; Il-Young Kim; Carlene Starck; Bryce J Marquis; Arny A Ferrando; Paul J Moughan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  Prolonged dietary selenium deficiency or excess does not globally affect selenoprotein gene expression and/or protein production in various tissues of pigs.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Hua Zhao; Qiaoshan Zhang; Jiayong Tang; Ke Li; Xin-Jie Xia; Kang-Ning Wang; Kui Li; Xin Gen Lei
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 3.  Protein quality as determined by the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score: evaluation of factors underlying the calculation.

Authors:  Robert R Wolfe; Shane M Rutherfurd; Il-Young Kim; Paul J Moughan
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Candidate chemosensory cells in the porcine stomach.

Authors:  Patricia Widmayer; Heinz Breer; Nicole Hass
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 5.  Evaluation of Protein Quality in Humans and Insights on Stable Isotope Approaches to Measure Digestibility - A Review.

Authors:  Sulagna Bandyopadhyay; Sindhu Kashyap; Juliane Calvez; Sarita Devi; Dalila Azzout-Marniche; Daniel Tomé; Anura V Kurpad; Claire Gaudichon
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.567

Review 6.  Successful development of satiety enhancing food products: towards a multidisciplinary agenda of research challenges.

Authors:  E Van Kleef; J C M Van Trijp; J J G C Van Den Borne; C Zondervan
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.176

7.  Receptors responsive to protein breakdown products in g-cells and d-cells of mouse, swine and human.

Authors:  Désirée Christine Haid; Constanze Jordan-Biegger; Patricia Widmayer; Heinz Breer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Limitations with the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) with Special Attention to Plant-Based Diets: a Review.

Authors:  Joel C Craddock; Angela Genoni; Emma F Strutt; David M Goldman
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2021-01-06

9.  Metabolic markers in Ossabaw pigs fed high fat diets enriched in regular or low α-linolenic acid soy oil.

Authors:  Ramesh B Potu; Hang Lu; Olayiwola Adeola; Kolapo M Ajuwon
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.169

10.  Effects of meat cooking, and of ingested amount, on protein digestion speed and entry of residual proteins into the colon: a study in minipigs.

Authors:  Marie-Laure Bax; Caroline Buffière; Noureddine Hafnaoui; Claire Gaudichon; Isabelle Savary-Auzeloux; Dominique Dardevet; Véronique Santé-Lhoutellier; Didier Rémond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.