Literature DB >> 8311273

The effect of lumbar epidural and general anesthesia on plasma catecholamines and hemodynamics during abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

M S Gold1, D DeCrosta, C Rizzuto, R R Ben-Harari, S Ramanathan.   

Abstract

Twenty-four patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair were studied to compare the effects of lumbar epidural anesthesia (LEA) and general anesthesia (GA) on plasma catecholamine levels and hemodynamics before and during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping. Patients received either a high dose of opioid anesthetic (GA group, n = 12), or lumbar epidural anesthesia to T4 sensory level with a light general anesthetic (LEA group, n = 12). Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) levels were measured before anesthetic induction (before epidural activation in the LEA group, and before general anesthesia induction in the GA group), 15 min before cross-clamping, and 1,5, and 10 min after cross-clamping. There was a large (P < 0.05) increase in NE and E in the GA group by 15 min before aortic cross-clamping, but NE and E levels in the LEA group did not increase. The GA group had significantly higher levels of NE and E than the LEA group 15 min before cross-clamping and also after clamping. NE levels in the LEA group increased after cross-clamping, and NE levels in the GA group remained constant. E levels remained stable in both groups after cross-clamping. After clamping, SVR increased in both groups, but the increase occurred after 1 min in the GA group and took 5 min to become significant in the LEA group. There was no significant correlation between changes in NE or E and changes in SVR in either group. This study shows that epidural anesthesia to T4 prevents NE and E increases in response to abdominal surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8311273     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199402000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

Review 2.  The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice.

Authors:  Robert J Moraca; David G Sheldon; Richard C Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-05

4.  Anesthesia-based evaluation of outcomes of lower-extremity vascular bypass procedures.

Authors:  Racheed J Ghanami; Justin Hurie; Jeanette S Andrews; Robert N Harrington; Matthew A Corriere; Philip P Goodney; Kimberley J Hansen; Matthew S Edwards
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 5.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.