Literature DB >> 8308047

An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions.

K P Granata1, W S Marras.   

Abstract

An EMG-assisted, low-back, lifting model is presented which simulates spinal loading as a function of dynamic, asymmetric, lifting exertions. The purpose of this study has been to develop a model which overcomes the limitations of previous models including static or isokinetic mechanics, inaccurate predictions of muscle coactivity, static interpretation of myoelectric activity, and physiologically unrealistic or variable muscle force per unit area. The present model predicts individual muscle forces from processed EMG data, normalized as a function of trunk angle and asymmetry, and modified to account for muscle length and velocity artifacts. The normalized EMGs are combined with muscle cross-sectional area and intrinsic strength capacity as determined on a per subject basis, to represent tensile force amplitudes. Dynamic internal and external force vectors are employed to predict trunk moments, spinal compression, lateral and anterior shear forces. Data from 20 subjects performing a total of 2160 exertions showed good agreement between predicted and measured values under all trunk angle, asymmetry, velocity, and acceleration conditions. The design represents a significant step toward accurate, fully dynamic modeling of the low-back in multiple dimensions. The benefits of such a model are the insights provided into the effects of motion induced, muscle co-activity on spinal loading in multiple dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8308047     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90093-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  Co-contraction recruitment and spinal load during isometric trunk flexion and extension.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Patrick E Lee; Timothy C Franklin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Stability of dynamic trunk movement.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Scott A England
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.

Authors:  Gregory G Knapik; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Musculoskeletal disorder risk during automotive assembly: current vs. seated.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; W Gary Allread; Gregory G Knapik; Riley E Splittstoesser
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  A comparison of a maximum exertion method and a model-based, sub-maximum exertion method for normalizing trunk EMG.

Authors:  Jacek Cholewicki; Jaap van Dieën; Angela S Lee; N Peter Reeves
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Comparison of lumbo-pelvic kinematics during trunk forward bending and backward return between patients with acute low back pain and asymptomatic controls.

Authors:  Iman Shojaei; Elizabeth G Salt; Quenten Hooker; Linda R Van Dillen; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Neuromuscular Evaluation of Trunk-Training Exercises.

Authors:  Peter Konrad; Klaus Schmitz; Achim Denner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Trunk Muscle Coactivation in People with and without Low Back Pain during Fatiguing Frequency-Dependent Lifting Activities.

Authors:  Tiwana Varrecchia; Silvia Conforto; Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Francesco Draicchio; Deborah Falla; Alberto Ranavolo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Biomechanical analysis of reducing sacroiliac joint shear load by optimization of pelvic muscle and ligament forces.

Authors:  J J M Pel; C W Spoor; A L Pool-Goudzwaard; G A Hoek van Dijke; C J Snijders
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.934

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.