Literature DB >> 8306270

Comparative tumor localization of whole immunoglobulin G anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibodies IMMU-4 and IMMU-4 F(ab')2 in colorectal cancer patients.

J L Murray1, M G Rosenblum, H Z Zhang, D A Podoloff, L P Kasi, S A Curley, J C Chan, M Roh, D C Hohn, H Brewer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in the literature have suggested that radiolabeled F(ab')2 fragments might be superior to whole immunoglobulin G (IgG) for imaging and therapy of cancer because of their greater penetration in tumors. To test this hypothesis, the authors compared tumor and normal tissue uptake along with plasma clearance of 125I-labeled monoclonal antibody (MoAb) IMMU-4 whole IgG with its 131I-labeled F(ab')2 fragment.
METHODS: Five patients with either liver metastases from colorectal cancer (n = 4) or intact primary tumors (n = 1) received a combination of 125I-IMMU-4 IgG (2 mCi/1 mg) plus 131I-IMMU-4 F(ab')2 (10 mCi/1 mg) as a single 1-hour intravenous infusion on day 1. Serial blood samples were taken for up to 72 hours postinfusion to determine plasma clearance of each MoAb. On days 3-9, patients underwent exploratory laparotomy in which biopsies of tumor as well as normal tissues (liver, normal colon, lymph node, and blood) were obtained. Tissues were weighed and counted in a gamma counter, and the percent of injected dose per kilogram (%ID/kg) of each antibody, along with the radiolocalization index (RI), was computed (RI = %ID/kg tumor.%ID/kg normal tissue).
RESULTS: Tumor uptake of both antibodies (2.3 +/- 0.53 %ID/kg) was significantly higher than that of normal tissues (0.56 +/- 0.12; P < 0.001), except for blood (2.8 +/- 0.83), resulting in an RI > or = 3. There were no significant differences in uptake (%ID/g) between F(ab')2 and IgG (F[ab']2 = 2.0 +/- 0.57; IgG = 2.6 +/- 0.94). The mean +/- SD of plasma T1/2 was slightly shorter for F(ab')2 (28.8 +/- 7.2 hours) than for IgG (45.9 +/- 16.7; P = 0.08).
CONCLUSION: In short, the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of IMMU-4 F(ab')2 were comparable to those of IMMU-4-IgG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8306270     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3+<850::aid-cncr2820731316>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

1.  Antibody Coadministration as a Strategy to Overcome Binding-Site Barrier for ADCs: a Quantitative Investigation.

Authors:  Aman P Singh; Leiming Guo; Ashwni Verma; Gloria Gao-Li Wong; Greg M Thurber; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Radioimmunoimaging of colorectal cancer using (99m)Tc labeled monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Jin-Yue Hu; Jian-Zhi Su; Zhi-Ming Pi; Jian-Gao Zhu; Guo-Hua Zhou; Qu-Bing Sun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Minor human antibody response to a mouse and chimeric monoclonal antibody after a single i.v. infusion in ovarian carcinoma patients: a comparison of five assays.

Authors:  M R Buist; P Kenemans; G J van Kamp; H J Haisma
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  A novel human monoclonal antibody specific to the A33 glycoprotein recognizes colorectal cancer and inhibits metastasis.

Authors:  Patrizia Murer; Louis Plüss; Dario Neri
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

5.  Quantitative intratumoural microdistribution and kinetics of (131)I-huA33 antibody in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Marika Ciprotti; Geoffrey Chong; Hui K Gan; Anthony Chan; Carmel Murone; Duncan MacGregor; Fook-Thean Lee; Terrance G Johns; Joan K Heath; Matthias Ernst; Antony W Burgess; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.138

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.