Literature DB >> 8305368

Results of endoscopic KTP laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy.

D M Reifler1.   

Abstract

Nineteen consecutive cases of primary endoscopic potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) were retrospectively studied. Follow-up ranged from 10 to 16 months. Patients ranged in age from 18 to 93 years (average 65.6 years). Preoperative epiphora was present in all patients, and associated with mucopyocele in nine patients. Bicanalicular-nasal silicone tubes were placed during surgery in all cases. Timing of tube removal in the office ranged from 5 to 15 weeks (average 8.9 weeks). Prolonged patency through the follow-up period was achieved in 13 of 19 cases (68.4%). The six cases (31.6%) of postoperative failure included three cases with preoperative mucopyocele and three cases without. Failures manifested with recurrent epiphora (three cases) or recurrent dacryocystitis (three cases); the onset of symptom recurrence varied from 7 to 27 weeks postoperatively (average 18.3 weeks). Although success rates will vary between surgeons and study populations, patients should be advised that the success rate of KTP laser-assisted DCR may be lower than that of standard DCR. Generally, indications for choosing laser-assisted DCR include the avoidance of a cutaneous incision and reduced potential for mucosal bleeding. The technique may be considered for use in selected cases of nasolacrimal obstruction. The importance of technical variations remains to be elucidated including rhinostomy size and timing of silicone tube removal. Further studies are needed to help define the role of endoscopy techniques and lasers in DCR surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8305368     DOI: 10.1097/00002341-199312000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0740-9303            Impact factor:   1.746


  7 in total

1.  Endoscopic DCR without stents: clinical guidelines and procedure.

Authors:  Basil M N Saeed
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Transcanalicular diode laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Brigita Drnovsek-Olup; Matej Beltram
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Comparative Analysis of Laser Assisted Endoscopie and Conventional Endoscopie Dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  S S Panwar; P Lal; P S Sukhtankar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Endonasal carbon-dioxide laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy verses external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Ashok Verma; Mazin Al Khabori; Rajiv Zutshi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-01

Review 5.  Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Lona Jawaheer; Caroline J MacEwen; Deepa Anijeet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-24

Review 6.  The Clinical Efficacy of Silicone Stents for Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Do Hyun Kim; Seon Ik Kim; Ho Jun Jin; Subin Kim; Se Hwan Hwang
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Clinical outcome of endonasal KTP laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Thomas Ressiniotis; Gerasimos M Voros; Vasilios T Kostakis; Sean Carrie; Christopher Neoh
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 2.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.