Literature DB >> 8305014

Age, sex, and temporary resident originated prescribing units (ASTRO-PUs): new weightings for analysing prescribing of general practices in England.

S J Roberts1, C M Harris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To derive demographic weightings to replace the existing system of prescribing units used in analysing prescribing by general practitioners in England.
DESIGN: The prescribing data for one year from a sample of 90 practices in 80 family health service authority areas were used to calculate the relative frequency with which items were prescribed, for each sex, in nine age bands and for temporary residents. Data on the variation in cost per item by age and sex then allowed estimates to be made of the relative costs for these groups. Integer values for both the item based and cost based weightings were obtained by conversion to optimal integer scales. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Item based and cost based weightings for each of the 18 age-sex groups and for temporary residents. The cost based weightings were considered more appropriate to the context in which the new system was to be used.
RESULTS: Prescribing costs increased noticeably, for both sexes, in the middle years (ages 35-64). Compared with the existing system, the cost based weightings (ASTRO-PUs) gave greater weight to patients aged 45 and over, especially those in the 55-64 age band, at the expense of younger patients. Children under 5 received twice as many items as those aged 5-14, but the inexpensiveness of their drugs made the cost based weightings of the two groups equal. Similarly, women were generally given more items than men, but at a lower average cost per item, which reduced differences between the sexes in the cost based weightings. Costs for patients aged 75 and over, compared with those aged 65-74, were higher only for women.
CONCLUSIONS: The cost based weightings proposed are believed to reflect the present distribution of prescribing costs, in relation to age and sex, in English general practice. They are intended for use in analyses at practice level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8305014      PMCID: PMC1678776          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6902.485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  39 in total

1.  Therapeutic substitution and therapeutic conservatism as cost-containment strategies in primary care: a study of fundholders and non-fundholders.

Authors:  R P Wilson; J Hatcher; S Barton; T Walley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Controlled trial of pharmacist intervention in general practice: the effect on prescribing costs.

Authors:  S Rodgers; A J Avery; D Meechan; S Briant; M Geraghty; K Doran; D K Whynes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Do GPs working in practice with high or low prescribing costs have different views on prescribing cost issues?

Authors:  A J Avery; R V Wetzels; S Rodgers; C O'Neill
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Derivation of a needs based capitation formula for allocating prescribing budgets to health authorities and primary care groups in England: regression analysis.

Authors:  N Rice; P Dixon; D C Lloyd; D Roberts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-29

5.  Analysis of the ability of the new needs adjustment formula to improve the setting of weighted capitation prescribing budgets in English general practice.

Authors:  D L Baines; D J Parry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-29

6.  Morbidity, deprivation, and antidepressant prescribing in general practice.

Authors:  I F Mackenzie; K Buckingham; J M Wankowski; M Wilcock
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Accrediting research practices.

Authors:  L F Smith; Y H Carter; J Cox
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Prescribing allocations: theory into practices.

Authors:  D Roberts
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Feasibility study of multicentre comparison of NHS hospital pharmacy computer data.

Authors:  P D Walker; T Walley
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  A prescription for improvement? An observational study to identify how general practices vary in their growth in prescribing costs.

Authors:  A J Avery; S Rodgers; T Heron; R Crombie; D Whynes; M Pringle; D Baines; R Petchey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.