BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because the timing and strategy of surgical intervention in massive cerebellar infarction remains controversial, we report our experience with the management of 52 such patients. METHODS: Case records, computed tomographic scans, surgical reports, and angiograms of 52 patients with space-occupying cerebellar infarction defined by computed tomographic criteria were reevaluated with regard to clinical course, etiology, therapeutic management, mortality, and functional outcome. RESULTS: In most cases clinical deterioration started on the third day after stroke, and a comatose state was reached within 24 hours. Sixteen patients were treated medically, and 30 by suboccipital craniectomy (22 plus ventriculostomy, 12 plus tonsillectomy). Ten patients primarily had ventriculostomy, which in 4 patients was supplemented by craniotomy because of continuing deterioration. Twenty-nine patients made a good recovery, 15 remained disabled, and 8 died. Even comatose patients had a 38% chance of a good recovery with decompressive surgery. Age older than 60 years (P = .0043) and probably initial brain stem signs (P = .0816) and a late clinical stage (P = .0893) were linked with a fatal or disabling outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Decompressive surgery should be the treatment of choice for massive cerebellar infarction causing progressive brain stem signs or impairment of consciousness.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because the timing and strategy of surgical intervention in massive cerebellar infarction remains controversial, we report our experience with the management of 52 such patients. METHODS: Case records, computed tomographic scans, surgical reports, and angiograms of 52 patients with space-occupying cerebellar infarction defined by computed tomographic criteria were reevaluated with regard to clinical course, etiology, therapeutic management, mortality, and functional outcome. RESULTS: In most cases clinical deterioration started on the third day after stroke, and a comatose state was reached within 24 hours. Sixteen patients were treated medically, and 30 by suboccipital craniectomy (22 plus ventriculostomy, 12 plus tonsillectomy). Ten patients primarily had ventriculostomy, which in 4 patients was supplemented by craniotomy because of continuing deterioration. Twenty-nine patients made a good recovery, 15 remained disabled, and 8 died. Even comatosepatients had a 38% chance of a good recovery with decompressive surgery. Age older than 60 years (P = .0043) and probably initial brain stem signs (P = .0816) and a late clinical stage (P = .0893) were linked with a fatal or disabling outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Decompressive surgery should be the treatment of choice for massive cerebellar infarction causing progressive brain stem signs or impairment of consciousness.
Authors: Alexander A Tarnutzer; Aaron L Berkowitz; Karen A Robinson; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; David E Newman-Toker Journal: CMAJ Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Jason Siegel; Michael A Pizzi; J Brent Peel; David Alejos; Nnenne Mbabuike; Benjamin L Brown; David Hodge; W David Freeman Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Eric Goulin Lippi Fernandes; Sami Ridwan; Isabell Greeve; Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz; Alexander Grote; Matthias Simon Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Andreas H Kramer; Nathan Deis; Stacy Ruddell; Philippe Couillard; David A Zygun; Christopher J Doig; Clare Gallagher Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.210