Literature DB >> 8300814

Comparative pharmacokinetics of two urinary human follicle stimulating hormone preparations in healthy female and male volunteers.

J Y le Cotonnec, H C Porchet, V Beltrami, C Howles.   

Abstract

These studies were designed to compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics of a very highly purified urinary human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH-HP) preparation (sp. act. approximately 9000 IU FSH/mg of protein), Metrodin HP, with a standard urinary FSH preparation Metrodin (FSH). The two preparations were administered in a balanced, random-order, cross-over sequence as single doses of 150 IU, separated by 1 week of washout to 12 female volunteers by i.v. injection and to 12 male volunteers by i.m. and s.c. routes. FSH concentrations were measured by immunoradiometric assay and by an in-vitro rat granulosa cell aromatase bioassay. After an i.v. bolus, the pharmacokinetics of the two FSH preparations were identical. Total clearance was 0.5 and 0.15 l/h respectively for immunoassay and bioassay data. Immunoassay showed that the two preparations were similar for renal clearance (0.1 l/h), volumes of distribution at steady state (9 l), distribution and terminal half-lives (2 and 17 h, respectively). After parenteral administrations, the absorption half-life of FSH was approximately 3 h and the apparent terminal half-life was approximately 1.5 days. Both preparations had relative bioavailabilities close to 100% for i.m. and s.c. administrations. Immunopurification, which results in a very highly purified FSH-HP, does not modify the pharmacokinetic properties of FSH. This study also confirmed that s.c. and i.m. doses of FSH-HP are equivalent from the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic points of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8300814     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

Review 1.  Safety of drugs used in assisted reproduction techniques.

Authors:  Talha Al-Shawaf; Ariel Zosmer; Martha Dirnfeld; Gedis Grudzinskas
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Comprehensive pharmacokinetics of urinary human follicle stimulating hormone in healthy female volunteers.

Authors:  J Y le Cotonnec; H C Porchet; V Beltrami; A Khan; S Toon; M Rowland
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Comparison of highly purified FSH (metrodin-high purity) with pergonal for IVF superovulation.

Authors:  J S Bagratee; G Lockwood; A López Bernal; D H Barlow; W L Ledger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The safety and effectiveness of stepwise and low-dose administration of follicle stimulating hormone in WHO group II anovulatory infertile women: evidence from a large multicenter study in Spain.

Authors:  J Balasch; R Tur; P Alvarez; J M Bajo; E Bosch; I Bruna; P Caballero; J Calaf; I Cano; E Carrillo; J A Duque; G Folguera; A de la Fuente; C Jiménez; G Laguens; E López; A Lozano; A Matarranz; C Moreno; J Nava; M Sanchis; E Temprano; G Ventura; J A Peinado
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Healthy Women Receiving Single and Multiple Doses of Highly Purified Human Menotrophin and Urofollitrophin.

Authors:  Andrea F D Di Stefano; Antonio Rusca; Milko M Radicioni; Luca Loprete; Daniela Binelli; Giorgio Caccia; Barbara Cometti
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of FE 999049, a Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone, in Healthy Women After Single Ascending Doses.

Authors:  Trine Høyer Rose; Daniel Röshammar; Lars Erichsen; Lars Grundemar; Johnny T Ottesen
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2016-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.