Literature DB >> 8299831

Perception of image quality in direct digital radiography after application of various image treatment filters for detectability of dental disease.

A Wenzel1, H Hintze.   

Abstract

This study evaluated dentists' perception of the quality of digitally captured radiographs. Thirty radiographs were taken with the Visualix digital video radiographic system, 10 periapicals for tooth and bone anatomy, 10 periapicals for bone disease and 10 bitewings for dental caries. Three numeric copies were made of each image and treated with three different filters: 'optimize', 'enhance' and 'enhance + smooth', respectively. Four images of the same case were displayed simultaneously in a random sequence on the monitor. Twenty dentists ranked each set of four images on a scale from 1 to 4. In general, most dentists preferred a treated image to the original. The optimized and enhanced images were selected most frequently as first or second choice from the tooth and bone anatomy and bone disease groups. The original image was ranked lowest in more than half (55%) of the series. For the bitewings, the smoothed images were ranked significantly higher. In conclusion, image treatment possibilities should be offered in digital radiography as the majority of dentists preferred a treated image to the original version. The image treatment chosen seemed to be task dependent; less treatment was required to delineate the more subtle tissue differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8299831     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.22.3.8299831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of using digital manipulation tools for diagnosing mandibular radiolucent lesions.

Authors:  R Raitz; J N R Assunção Junior; M Fenyo-Pereira; L Correa; L P de Lima
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.

Authors:  B G Baksi; E Alpöz; E Sogur; A Mert
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Caries detection under composite restorations by laser fluorescence and digital radiography.

Authors:  Suwadee Kositbowornchai; Chotikpanich Sukanya; Tangkittikasem Tidarat; Thongsombat Chanoggarn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth.

Authors:  Francisco Haiter-Neto; Andrea dos Anjos Pontual; Morten Frydenberg; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A Subjective Assessment of Perceived Clarity of Indirect Digital Images and Processed Digital Images with Conventional Intra-oral Periapical Radiographs.

Authors:  Suchetha N Malleshi; Mahima V G; Anudeepa Raina; Karthikeya Patil
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

6.  Accuracy of digital image enhancement in detection of vertical and horizontal root fracture.

Authors:  Maryam Ghazizadeh; Mahnaz Sheikhi; Maedeh Aminian; Mohammad Moein Ghazizadeh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.