Literature DB >> 8299743

The medial temporal lobe in encoding, retention, retrieval and interhemispheric transfer of visual memory in primates.

J L Ringo1.   

Abstract

Low-level electrical stimulation through electrodes in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) was used to disrupt the performance of chiasm-split macaques working in a delayed matching-to-sample (DMS) visual memory task. The stimulation was below afterdischarge threshold and did not distract the animals. Nonetheless, stimulation caused severe deficits when delivered either during encoding or retrieval stages. Substantially less deficit appeared when stimulation was delivered during the retention interval. Stimulation levels which led to significant disruption on the DMS task had no effect on a discrimination task using the same kinds of images. Unilateral electrical stimulation delivered to MTL in one hemisphere during encoding and to MTL in the other hemisphere during retrieval produced an effective disruption, suggesting that the unilateral stimulation during the encoding period disrupts the encoding on that side while unilateral stimulation delivered to the opposite side during the retrieval period prevents the retrieval of the (now unilateral) memory. This suggestion is supported by control experiments in which significantly less disruption was caused by unilateral electrical stimulation delivered during both the encoding and the retrieval period if the stimulation was delivered to the same side in both periods. The electrical stimulation was further used to determine that interhemispheric access by one hemisphere to memories placed in the other was excellent. This was done, in these split-chiasm monkeys, by using unilateral stimulation to limit memory formation to just one hemisphere, then testing interhemispheric access by routing the test through the "ignorant" hemisphere (using just the ipsilateral eye). Successful interhemispheric access was obtained with either the anterior commissure or with the splenium of the corpus callosum (the other interhemispheric forebrain pathways having been cut). The electrical stimulation was also used to determine that the visual inputs even though entering via just one eye and one hemisphere, lead to bilateral memory formation. In this case each hemisphere was tested separately during retrieval by delivering disruptive levels of the electrical stimulation to the MTL of the other hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8299743     DOI: 10.1007/BF00234108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF CORTICAL AND SUBCORTICAL STIMULATION ON DELAYED RESPONSE IN MONKEYS.

Authors:  S N CIANCI
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Bi-versus monohemispheric performance in split-brain and partially split-brain macaques.

Authors:  J L Ringo; R W Doty; S Demeter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Retardation of rabbit nictitating membrane conditioning by subseizure electrical stimulation of hippocampus.

Authors:  W R Salafia; N L Chiaia; J J Ramirez
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1979-03

4.  Effective stimulation distance for current from macroelectrodes.

Authors:  K A Follett; M D Mann
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  The performance of visual tasks while segments of the inferotemporal cortex are suppressed by cold.

Authors:  J A Horel; D E Pytko-Joiner; M L Voytko; K Salsbury
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Well-kept secrets of the right hemisphere: a carotid amytal study of restriced memory transfer.

Authors:  G L Risse; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Effect of low-intensity hippocampal stimulation on spatial versus working memory in rats.

Authors:  T W Parker; R E Walley
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  The unilateral engram.

Authors:  R W Doty; N Negrão; K Yamaga
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 1.579

9.  Electrical stimulation of inferotemporal and occipital cortex in monkeys: effects on visual discrimination and spatial reversal performance.

Authors:  S G Goldrich; J S Stamm
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1971-03

10.  Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with rhinal cortex ablations succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hr intertrial intervals and fail at matching to sample despite double sample presentations.

Authors:  D Gaffan; E A Murray
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  1 in total

1.  Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials.

Authors:  K Bötzel; S Schulze; S R Stodieck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.