Literature DB >> 82997

Are doctors able to assess prostatic size?

H H Meyhoff, T Hald.   

Abstract

The between-observer variation was evaluated through three independent estimates of preoperative prostatic weight in each of 40 patients. Error in the estimates was of considerable magnitude irrespective of size of prostates. Experienced urologists did not attain a more reliable estimate than unexperienced doctors. Only about 2/3 of estimates were correct within a range of +/- 25 g. However, there was a statistically significant correlation between estimated and actual operative prostatic weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 82997     DOI: 10.3109/00365597809179720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  5 in total

Review 1.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia and its treatment.

Authors:  J B Stimson; S D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Underdetection of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia in a general medical practice.

Authors:  M F Collins; R H Friedman; A Ash; R Hall; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Preoperative estimation of the size of prostatic adenomas.

Authors:  J Pillgram-Larsen; A Fryjordet
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Prostate volume measurement by TRUS using heights obtained by transaxial and midsagittal scanning: comparison with specimen volume following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  S B Park; J K Kim; S H Choi; H N Noh; E K Ji; K S Cho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Prostatic hypertrophy and venereal disease as possible risk factors in the development of bladder cancer.

Authors:  S Mommsen; A Sell
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1983
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.