Literature DB >> 8299334

Chest radiography guidelines for general practitioners: a practical approach.

P W Bearcroft1, J H Small, C D Flower.   

Abstract

An intensive programme of guideline development and dissemination is not always practical. We designed general practitioner guidelines for chest radiography and disseminated them to a group of 33 practices selected randomly from the practices that refer more than five patients for chest radiography annually. The subsequent 2500 requests were analysed and demographic data, the referring practice and the relevant history noted. We documented a reduction in the proportion of referrals that were contrary to the guidelines by 30.5% (from 8.2% to 5.7%, P = 0.016), a reduction in referral rate with an inadequate history by 29.7% (from 15.5% to 10.9%, P = 0.0008) and an increase in the frequency that a presumptive diagnosis was stated by 14.5% (from 42.9% to 49.1%, P = 0.0025). There was no overall reduction in referral rate in the study group and the reasons for this are discussed. We conclude that guidelines for chest radiography are effective in reducing inappropriate requests and can also improve the clinical information provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8299334     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)82916-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  9 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for future studies: a systematic review of educational interventions in primary care settings.

Authors:  U Freudenstein; A Howe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 3.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Anik Giguère; France Légaré; Jeremy Grimshaw; Stéphane Turcotte; Michelle Fiander; Agnes Grudniewicz; Sun Makosso-Kallyth; Fredric M Wolf; Anna P Farmer; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

4.  How do general practitioners respond to reports of abnormal chest X-rays?

Authors:  W S Lim; J T Macfarlane; P C Deegan; A Manhire; W F Holmes; D R Baldwin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Chest radiography in general practice: indications, diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management.

Authors:  Anouk M Speets; Yolanda van der Graaf; Arno W Hoes; Sandra Kalmijn; Alfred Pe Sachs; Matthieu Jcm Rutten; Jan Willem C Gratama; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Willem Pthm Mali
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Strategies to reduce the use of low-value medical tests in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Toshihiko Takada; Pauline Heus; Sander van Doorn; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Jan-Willem Weenink; Simone A van Dulmen; Lotty Hooft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Testing the effectiveness of an innovative information package on practitioner reported behaviour and beliefs: the UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low back pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) trial [ISRCTN77245761].

Authors:  David W Evans; Nadine E Foster; Martin Underwood; Steven Vogel; Alan C Breen; Tamar Pincus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  What is the effectiveness of printed educational materials on primary care physician knowledge, behaviour, and patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Agnes Grudniewicz; Ryan Kealy; Reitze N Rodseth; Jemila Hamid; David Rudoler; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Health care personnel's perception of guideline implementation for musculoskeletal imaging: a process evaluation.

Authors:  Ann Mari Gransjøen; Siri Wiig; Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.