Literature DB >> 8297056

On tooth movement.

R J Isaacson1, S J Lindauer, M Davidovitch.   

Abstract

Current concepts of clinical orthodontic tooth movement are misleading. Traditionally, these have been described as dependent on force levels and being tipping/bodily in nature. The following is a reevaluation of the relationships between tooth movement and orthodontic mechanotherapy not usually considered when analyzing tooth movement clinically. It is our contention that confusion as to the biological response(s) to mechanical force is derived from in vivo orthodontic trials where conditions are undefined. This correlates with variable biological responses within the periodontium. Constantly changing moment to force ratios inherent to the dynamic load deflection rates of any system used to move a tooth cause changing tendencies for crown/root tipping. This implies that the accepted notion of static translatory tooth movement, although a useful didactic concept, is currently unattainable. In actuality, it has never been documented empirically using any conventional orthodontic appliance.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8297056     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1993)063<0305:OTM>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  4 in total

Review 1.  Electrical implications of corrosion for osseointegration of titanium implants.

Authors:  R A Gittens; R Olivares-Navarrete; R Tannenbaum; B D Boyan; Z Schwartz
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  A comparison of resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets under an increasing applied moment.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Knowledge of orthodontic tooth movement through the maxillary sinus: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wentian Sun; Kai Xia; Xinqi Huang; Xiao Cen; Qing Liu; Jun Liu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies.

Authors:  Yunyan Ke; Yanfei Zhu; Min Zhu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.