Literature DB >> 8296849

Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system.

J P Lerner1, I E Timor-Tritsch, A Federman, G Abramovich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to modify a previously devised morphologic scoring system with the use of transvaginal ultrasonography in the hope of improving discrimination of benign from malignant ovarian and adnexal masses. STUDY
DESIGN: Transvaginal ultrasonographic images of 312 patients for a total of 350 ovarian and adnexal masses were obtained over a 3-year period. The derived morphologic data were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis to select the best performance of the previously described scoring system by Sassone et al. in 1991. This system was thus modified in several ways including weighted point value assignments, fewer point values per variable studied, the deletion of one variable found not to be significant (wall thickness), and the inclusion of a new variable called shadowing.
RESULTS: At surgery, 308 benign masses, 31 malignant masses, and 11 tumors of low malignant potential were found. The mean point value obtained was 1.8 for the benign masses, 3.9 for the tumors of low malignant potential, and 5.6 for the malignant tumors (p < 0.0005). With a cutoff of > or = 3 used as the best discriminator, the sensitivity was 96.8% and the specificity 77%. The positive and negative predictive values were 29.4% and 99.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Limitations of the previously devised scoring system included the arbitrary point assignments of each variable, the multiple (4 or 5) point choices for each variable, and the poor positive predictive value. This new scoring system performs well in the differentiation of benign from malignant masses, while assigning scientifically derived, therefore more valid, point values and simplifying the system overall. That the positive predictive value was not improved proves that ultrasonographically, to date we are still hampered by complex and malignant-appearing benign ovarian masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8296849     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70388-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  15 in total

Review 1.  Modern trends into the epidemiology and screening of ovarian cancer. Genetic substrate of the sporadic form.

Authors:  Maria Koutsaki; Apostolos Zaravinos; Demetrios A Spandidos
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Ovarian cancer screening and early detection in the general population.

Authors:  Jose A Rauh-Hain; Thomas C Krivak; Marcela G Del Carmen; Alexander B Olawaiye
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011

3.  Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  J E Dodge; A L Covens; C Lacchetti; L M Elit; T Le; M Devries-Aboud; M Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  A new computer-aided diagnostic tool for non-invasive characterisation of malignant ovarian masses: results of a multicentre validation study.

Authors:  Olivier Lucidarme; Jean-Paul Akakpo; Seth Granberg; Mario Sideri; Hanoch Levavi; Achim Schneider; Philippe Autier; Dror Nir; Harry Bleiberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Accuracy of Pelvic Mass Score in Pre-operative Determination of Malignancy in Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Lakshmi Mohan; Arun Rao; Sonali Ullal; Gowtham Krishna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

6.  Ovarian cancer pathogenesis: a model in evolution.

Authors:  Alison M Karst; Ronny Drapkin
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-09-06       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 7.  Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI.

Authors:  Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Diagnosis and management of adnexal masses in pregnancy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Adamu Yakasai; Lawal Abdullahi Bappa
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2012-07

Review 9.  PET/CT and cross sectional imaging of gynecologic malignancy.

Authors:  Revathy B Iyer; Aparna Balachandran; Catherine E Devine
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a literature review.

Authors:  F R Nezhat; S Tazuke; C H Nezhat; D S Seidman; D R Phillips; C R Nezhat
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.