Literature DB >> 8296772

Occupational exposures associated with male breast cancer.

P F Rosenbaum1, J E Vena, M A Zielezny, A M Michalek.   

Abstract

The role of occupational exposure to heat and electromagnetic fields was investigated in a case-control study of male breast cancer. Seventy-one cases reported to the New York State Tumor Registry between 1979 and 1988 were compared with 256 healthy male controls. Controls were frequency matched to cases by race, year of diagnosis, and age in 5-year intervals. Unconditional logistic regression modeling indicated that males with occupations that involved heat exposure had an elevated risk for the disease. The age- and county-adjusted odds ratio was 2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-5.3). Exposure to heat on the job could influence testicular function. No increase in disease risk was observed for males believed to have occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (odds ratio = 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.9).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8296772     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  9 in total

1.  Case-control study of occupational exposures and male breast cancer.

Authors:  P Cocco; L Figgs; M Dosemeci; R Hayes; M S Linet; A W Hsing
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  EMFs: cutting through the controversy.

Authors:  D Wartenberg
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Metin Yalaza; Aydın İnan; Mikdat Bozer
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-01-01

4.  Occupation and occupational exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals in male breast cancer: a case-control study in Europe.

Authors:  Sara Villeneuve; Diane Cyr; Elsebeth Lynge; Laurent Orsi; Svend Sabroe; Franco Merletti; Giuseppe Gorini; Maria Morales-Suarez-Varela; Wolfgang Ahrens; Cornelia Baumgardt-Elms; Linda Kaerlev; Mikael Eriksson; Lennart Hardell; Joëlle Févotte; Pascal Guénel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Prospective evaluation of risk factors for male breast cancer.

Authors:  Louise A Brinton; Douglas A Richesson; Gretchen L Gierach; James V Lacey; Yikyung Park; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and Health.

Authors:  I C Ahlbom; E Cardis; A Green; M Linet; D Savitz; A Swerdlow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Industrialization, electromagnetic fields, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  L I Kheifets; C C Matkin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Male breast cancer: is the scenario changing.

Authors:  Kaiyumars B Contractor; Kanchan Kaur; Gabriel S Rodrigues; Dhananjay M Kulkarni; Hemant Singhal
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Occupational exposure to magnetic fields and breast cancer among Canadian men.

Authors:  Anne Grundy; Shelley A Harris; Paul A Demers; Kenneth C Johnson; David A Agnew; Paul J Villeneuve
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.