Literature DB >> 8296468

Motion contrast and motion integration.

J Zhang1, S L Yeh, K K De Valois.   

Abstract

When a moving aperture contains a drifting grating, the perception of aperture movement is strongly affected by the grating movement. We have studied this interaction, using a moving circular patch of sinusoidal grating matched to the background in mean luminance. The circular window, or aperture, could be defined either by an abrupt transition from a full-contrast grating to the background (hard aperture) or by a two-dimensional Gaussian fall-off in contrast (soft aperture). The grating movement could be controlled independently of the aperture motion. Subjects judged the direction of the aperture movement (i.e. the movement of the patch as a whole). We find that an illusory motion of a stationary aperture can be induced depending on the direction of the grating drift. A hard aperture presented in the fovea appears to move in the direction opposite the grating movement, demonstrating simultaneous motion contrast. However, a soft aperture presented in the periphery appears to move in the same direction as the drifting grating, demonstrating motion integration (assimilation). These results are discussed in the context of interactions between short-range and long-range motion mechanisms and with respect to the significance of boundaries in determining the figure-ground relationship of motion signals.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8296468     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90231-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  Motion perception: from phi to omega.

Authors:  D Rose; R Blake
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Diverted by dazzle: perceived movement direction is biased by target pattern orientation.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Christian Jones; Kaustuv Joshi; David J Tolhurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Orientation-dependent biases in length judgments of isolated stimuli.

Authors:  Jielei Emma Zhu; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Dissociation of neuronal and psychophysical responses to local and global motion.

Authors:  James H Hedges; Yevgeniya Gartshteyn; Adam Kohn; Nicole C Rust; Michael N Shadlen; William T Newsome; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Visual motion shifts saccade targets.

Authors:  Anna A Kosovicheva; Benjamin A Wolfe; David Whitney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Transitions between central and peripheral vision create spatial/temporal distortions: a hypothesis concerning the perceived break of the curveball.

Authors:  Arthur Shapiro; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang; Emily Knight; Robert Ennis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A first- and second-order motion energy analysis of peripheral motion illusions leads to further evidence of "feature blur" in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Arthur G Shapiro; Emily J Knight; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Perceived positions determine crowding.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Motion noise changes directional interaction between transparently moving stimuli from repulsion to attraction.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gaudio; Xin Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Roles of Non-retinotopic Motions in Visual Search.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Isamu Motoyoshi; Takao Sato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.