Literature DB >> 8294963

Morphology and topography of identified primary afferents in trigeminal subnuclei principalis and oralis.

M F Jacquin1, W E Renehan, R W Rhoades, W M Panneton.   

Abstract

1. Intra-axonal recording, receptive field mapping, horseradish peroxidase injection, cytochrome oxidase staining, and computer-assisted reconstruction/morphometric methods were used to elucidate the structure and topography of trigeminal primary afferent collaterals in the normal adult rat. Prior studies focused on trigeminal brain stem subnuclei interpolaris and caudalis. This work is extended here to the remaining 2 subnuclei, principalis (PrV) and oralis (SpVo), where collaterals from 66 axons in 37 adult rats were studied. In nine rats, three to five axons were stained for within-nucleus comparisons of different fibers. Quantitative analyses were restricted to vibrissa sensitive fibers. 2. All of the axons conducted rapidly with small, low-threshold receptive fields. The majority responded to vibrissa deflection (n = 47); the remainder responded to guard hair deflection; gentle pressure applied to hairy skin, glabrous skin, lingual mucosa, or an incisor; or jaw movement. All descended in the trigeminal sensory root where some bifurcated into ascending and descending branches. Each well-stained fiber gave rise to transversely oriented collaterals in PrV and SpVo. 3. Within PrV and SpVo, fibers with differing adaptation properties and receptive fields had indistinguishable collateral morphologies. Arbors from single axons were rostrocaudally discontinuous, small relative to collaterals in subnuclei interpolaris and caudalis, circumscribed and topographically organized in a manner consistent with cytochrome oxidase and bulk-labeled primary afferent staining patterns. In SpVo and caudal PrV, the map is inverted with the nose pointing medially. In rostral PrV, the map turns 90 degrees such that the nose points dorsally. 4. Axons had different quantitative properties along the rostrocaudal axis of the trigeminal brain stem complex. Whereas arbors subtended similar transverse areas throughout PrV and SpVo, collaterals in the rostral third of PrV had a relatively low bouton density. Arbors in the caudal two thirds of PrV had the highest bouton density. Arbors in SpVo tended to be more variable in size and shape than those of caudal PrV, and their bouton numbers were significantly lower than in PrV. 5. In PrV, arbors were largely confined to somatotopically corresponding cytochrome oxidase patches, precluding significant overlap of neighboring whisker projections. In SpVo, termination sites were not as strictly confined and numerous examples of within- and between-row overlap were obtained for whisker afferents in cases where multiple axons were stained.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8294963     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.5.1911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

Review 1.  The barrel cortex--integrating molecular, cellular and systems physiology.

Authors:  Carl C H Petersen
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  The organization of submodality-specific touch afferent inputs in the vibrissa column.

Authors:  Katsuyasu Sakurai; Masahiro Akiyama; Bin Cai; Alexandra Scott; Bao-Xia Han; Jun Takatoh; Markus Sigrist; Silvia Arber; Fan Wang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  NMDA receptor-dependent regulation of axonal and dendritic branching.

Authors:  Li-Jen Lee; Fu-Sun Lo; Reha S Erzurumlu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A star in the brainstem reveals the first step of cortical magnification.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania; Duncan B Leitch; Danielle Gauthier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Corticofugal projection patterns of whisker sensorimotor cortex to the sensory trigeminal nuclei.

Authors:  Jared B Smith; Glenn D R Watson; Kevin D Alloway; Cornelius Schwarz; Shubhodeep Chakrabarti
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Complementary processing of haptic information by slowly and rapidly adapting neurons in the trigeminothalamic pathway. Electrophysiology, mathematical modeling and simulations of vibrissae-related neurons.

Authors:  Abel Sanchez-Jimenez; Carlos Torets; Fivos Panetsos
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.505

7.  Structure-function correlations of rat trigeminal primary neurons: Emphasis on club-like endings, a vibrissal mechanoreceptor.

Authors:  Sotatsu Tonomura; Satomi Ebara; Knarik Bagdasarian; Daisuke Uta; Ehud Ahissar; Inbal Meir; Ilan Lampl; Daichi Kuroda; Takahiro Furuta; Hidemasa Furue; Kenzo Kumamoto
Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.493

8.  Representation of Stimulus Speed and Direction in Vibrissal-Sensitive Regions of the Trigeminal Nuclei: A Comparison of Single Unit and Population Responses.

Authors:  Aniket S Kaloti; Erik C Johnson; Chris S Bresee; Stephanie N Naufel; Matthew G Perich; Douglas L Jones; Mitra J Z Hartmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Rich spatio-temporal stimulus dynamics unveil sensory specialization in cortical area S2.

Authors:  Matías A Goldin; Evan R Harrell; Luc Estebanez; Daniel E Shulz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Whisker-Mediated Touch System in Rodents: From Neuron to Behavior.

Authors:  Mehdi Adibi
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.