Literature DB >> 8294287

Effects of diet and hindgut defaunation on diet digestibility and microbial concentrations in the cecum and colon of the horse.

B E Moore1, B A Dehority.   

Abstract

The effects of diet and hindgut defaunation (removal of protozoa from the hindgut) on diet digestibility (Trial 1) and on total and cellulolytic bacterial and fungal concentrations in the cecum and colon (Trial 2) were investigated. A high-forage (HF) diet, 90% alfalfa hay-10% concentrate, or a higher-concentrate (HC) diet, 60% alfalfa hay-40% concentrate, was limit-fed. In Trial 1, defaunation resulted in a slight decrease in DM digestibility (P < .1) and had no effect on cellulose digestibility. Dry matter digestibility was higher (P < .001) with the HC diet; however, no differences were observed in cellulose digestion. For the faunated periods, protozoal concentrations were similar in the cecum and greater in the colon for both diets (P < .05). A diet x location interaction was observed for the genera Buetschlia and Blepharocorys. In Trial 2, defaunation had no effect on either total or cellulolytic bacterial concentrations in the cecum or colon. Total bacterial concentrations were higher (P < .06) in the colon when ponies were fed the HC diet. Defaunation did not affect total fungal concentrations in the cecum; however, fungal concentrations in the colon were slightly higher (P < .1) when the ponies were defaunated. Diet had no effect on total or cellulolytic fungal concentrations. Both total and cellulolytic fungal concentrations were approximately 10-fold higher in the colon than in the cecum (P < .01). Protozoa do not seem to play an essential role in the fermentation of feedstuffs in the equine hindgut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8294287     DOI: 10.2527/1993.71123350x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Identification of Ruminococcus flavefaciens as the predominant cellulolytic bacterial species of the equine cecum.

Authors:  V Julliand; A de Vaux; L Millet; G Fonty
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparative analysis of the methanogen diversity in horse and pony by using mcrA gene and archaeal 16s rRNA gene clone libraries.

Authors:  Khin-Ohnmar Lwin; Hiroki Matsui
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.273

3.  Faecal microbiota of forage-fed horses in New Zealand and the population dynamics of microbial communities following dietary change.

Authors:  Karlette A Fernandes; Sandra Kittelmann; Christopher W Rogers; Erica K Gee; Charlotte F Bolwell; Emma N Bermingham; David G Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multi-kingdom characterization of the core equine fecal microbiota based on multiple equine (sub)species.

Authors:  J E Edwards; S A Shetty; P van den Berg; F Burden; D A van Doorn; W F Pellikaan; J Dijkstra; H Smidt
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-02-12

Review 5.  The gut microbiome of horses: current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives.

Authors:  Anne Kauter; Lennard Epping; Torsten Semmler; Esther-Maria Antao; Dania Kannapin; Sabita D Stoeckle; Heidrun Gehlen; Antina Lübke-Becker; Sebastian Günther; Lothar H Wieler; Birgit Walther
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2019-11-13

6.  Domesticated equine species and their derived hybrids differ in their fecal microbiota.

Authors:  J E Edwards; A Schennink; F Burden; S Long; D A van Doorn; W F Pellikaan; J Dijkstra; E Saccenti; H Smidt
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-03-16

7.  Establishment and assessment of an amplicon sequencing method targeting the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon for analysis of the equine gut microbiome.

Authors:  Yuta Kinoshita; Hidekazu Niwa; Eri Uchida-Fujii; Toshio Nukada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison of microbial populations in the small intestine, large intestine and feces of healthy horses using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Authors:  Angelika Schoster; Luis Guillermo Arroyo; Henry Rolf Staempfli; Jeffrey Scott Weese
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-03-12

9.  Strong stability and host specific bacterial community in faeces of ponies.

Authors:  Tina M Blackmore; Alex Dugdale; Caroline McG Argo; Gemma Curtis; Eric Pinloche; Pat A Harris; Hilary J Worgan; Susan E Girdwood; Kirsty Dougal; C Jamie Newbold; Neil R McEwan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Non-invasive evaluation of the equine gastrointestinal mucosal transcriptome.

Authors:  Michelle C Coleman; Canaan Whitfield-Cargile; Noah D Cohen; Jennifer L Goldsby; Laurie Davidson; Ana M Chamoun-Emanuelli; Ivan Ivanov; Susan Eades; Nancy Ing; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.