BACKGROUND: Few women with locally advanced breast cancer remain disease-free, even for 2 years. Response to induction chemotherapy may be associated with longer disease-free and overall survival rates. The role of breast conservation in selected patients with response to induction chemotherapy was evaluated. METHODS: Since 1979, patients with Stages IIB and III breast cancer have undergone induction chemotherapy; patients with response continued chemotherapy until a plateau of regression was achieved. Before 1983, all patients having a response to chemotherapy underwent mastectomy; since 1983, selected patients have undergone breast conservation. Outcomes were tallied comparing these two groups of patients. RESULTS: The study group included 189 women, who were followed up for 12-159 months (median, 46 months) after diagnosis. Of the patients, 85% had a response to induction chemotherapy. Patients with no response were excluded from additional consideration in this study. One hundred three (64%) women underwent mastectomy; 55 (36%) were treated with breast conservation. The disease-free 5-year survival rate was 61% for all patients with a response to chemotherapy; 56% for those having mastectomy and 77% for those having breast conservation. The overall 5-year survival rate was 69% for all patients with a response to chemotherapy, 67% for those undergoing mastectomy and 80% for those having breast conservation. CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy achieves significant tumor regression in most women with locally advanced breast cancer, permitting subsequent breast conservation or mastectomy with a greater expectation of long-term success. Breast conservation is used more frequently with the same expectation of success as mastectomy, presuming careful selection based on response to chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Few women with locally advanced breast cancer remain disease-free, even for 2 years. Response to induction chemotherapy may be associated with longer disease-free and overall survival rates. The role of breast conservation in selected patients with response to induction chemotherapy was evaluated. METHODS: Since 1979, patients with Stages IIB and III breast cancer have undergone induction chemotherapy; patients with response continued chemotherapy until a plateau of regression was achieved. Before 1983, all patients having a response to chemotherapy underwent mastectomy; since 1983, selected patients have undergone breast conservation. Outcomes were tallied comparing these two groups of patients. RESULTS: The study group included 189 women, who were followed up for 12-159 months (median, 46 months) after diagnosis. Of the patients, 85% had a response to induction chemotherapy. Patients with no response were excluded from additional consideration in this study. One hundred three (64%) women underwent mastectomy; 55 (36%) were treated with breast conservation. The disease-free 5-year survival rate was 61% for all patients with a response to chemotherapy; 56% for those having mastectomy and 77% for those having breast conservation. The overall 5-year survival rate was 69% for all patients with a response to chemotherapy, 67% for those undergoing mastectomy and 80% for those having breast conservation. CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy achieves significant tumor regression in most women with locally advanced breast cancer, permitting subsequent breast conservation or mastectomy with a greater expectation of long-term success. Breast conservation is used more frequently with the same expectation of success as mastectomy, presuming careful selection based on response to chemotherapy.
Authors: Sylvia Adams; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Martin Donach; Darcy Spicer; Stella Lymberis; Baljit Singh; Joshua A Bauer; Tsivia Hochman; Judith D Goldberg; Franco Muggia; Robert J Schneider; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Silvia C Formenti Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Julie S Wecsler; Welela Tereffe; Rose C Pedersen; Michelle R Sieffert; Wendy J Mack; Haiyan Cui; Christy A Russell; Ryan R Woods; Rebecca K Viscusi; Stephen F Sener; Julie E Lang Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Catherine L Akay; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Elizabeth G Grubbs; Isabelle Bedrosian; Susan L Tucker; Henry M Kuerer; Karen E Hoffman; Gildy V Babiera; Eric A Strom; Thomas A Buchholz; Elizabeth A Mittendorf Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-08-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Samuel W Beenken; Marshall M Urist; Yuting Zhang; Renee Desmond; Helen Krontiras; Heriberto Medina; Kirby I Bland Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 12.969