Literature DB >> 8292133

Administrative costs in U.S. hospitals.

S Woolhandler1, D U Himmelstein, J P Lewontin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous estimates of administrative costs in U.S. hospitals have been based on figures for California, and nationwide extrapolation has been controversial. If the costs of bureaucracy are high, major policy reforms may yield substantial savings.
METHODS: We obtained detailed data on hospital expenses for fiscal year 1990 from reports submitted to Medicare by 6400 hospitals. We calculated each hospital's administrative costs by summing expenses in the following Medicare cost-accounting categories: administrative and general, nursing administration, central services and supply (excluding the purchase cost of supplies), medical records and library, utilization review, and the salary costs of the employee benefits department. We classified costs in most other categories as clinical. Some small categories of expenses (e.g., gift shop) were excluded from both our clinical and administrative groupings, and for others (e.g., plant operations), a proportional share was allocated between the two groupings.
RESULTS: Nationwide, administration accounted for an average of 24.8 percent of each hospital's spending in fiscal 1990. Average hospital administrative costs ranged from 20.5 percent in Minnesota to 30.6 percent in Hawaii. Administrative salaries accounted for 22.4 percent of the average hospital's salary costs. Administrative costs were similar in states with high and low rates of enrollment in health maintenance organizations (HMOs).
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital administrative costs in the United States are higher than previous estimates and more than twice as high as those in Canada. Greater enrollment in HMOs, with more competitive bidding by hospitals for managed-care contracts, an important element of proposed managed-competition health care reforms, does not seem to lower hospital administrative costs.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8292133     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199308053290606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  10 in total

1.  Why not private health insurance? 1. Insurance made easy.

Authors:  R Deber; A Gildiner; P Baranek
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Who will have health insurance in the future? An updated projection.

Authors:  Richard A Young; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Understanding the costs of asthma: the next step.

Authors:  K B Weiss; S D Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Oregon's health care rationing plan. Committee on Bioethical Issues of the Medical Society of the State of New York.

Authors:  F Rosner; P Kark; S Packer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Health care the tie that binds.

Authors:  A D Brown; R Y McMurtry
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Emergency departments: an important component of public health.

Authors:  B C Scott
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  The value of risk-reducing information.

Authors:  R S Woodward; S B Boxerman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Attitudes of Washington State physicians toward health care reform.

Authors:  A D Malter; L L Emerson; J W Krieger
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-07

9.  Differential clinical workloads among faculty at a major academic health center.

Authors:  G B Zelenock; J C Stanley; R A More; L J Greenfield; C J Shanley; L A Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Who administers? Who cares? Medical administrative and clinical employment in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  D U Himmelstein; J P Lewontin; S Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.308

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.