Literature DB >> 8290195

Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.

R L Sweet1, S Roy, S Faro, W F O'Brien, J S Sanfilippo, M Seidlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of piperacillin and tazobactam with that of clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with infections of the upper genital tract.
METHODS: This was a randomized open-label trial in hospitalized women with infections of the upper genital tract. Patients were recruited at 12 hospitals in the United States and two hospitals in Canada and were randomly assigned to one of two regimens in a 2:1 ratio. One group received piperacillin, 3 g every 6 hours, and tazobactam, 375 mg every 6 hours; the other group received clindamycin, 900 mg every 8 hours, and gentamicin, 2.5-5.0 mg/kg/day in three divided doses. Therapy with the assigned regimen was to be administered for a minimum of 3 days. Cultures for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were obtained from the site of infection before initiation of therapy. Cultures for Chlamydia trachomatis were also obtained from patients with endometritis or pelvic inflammatory disease. Subjects were evaluated for clinical and bacteriologic response at 24-72 hours and 2-4 weeks after completing therapy.
RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled; 196 were in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 103 were in the clindamycin-gentamicin group. The most common diagnoses were endometritis (146) and pelvic inflammatory disease (115). The most common microorganisms recovered included: Peptostreptococcus sp (99), Prevotella sp (87), black pigmented Bacteroides (29), B fragilis (11), enterococci (64), group B streptococcus (26), Escherichia coli (31), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (49), and C trachomatis (19). A favorable clinical response occurred in 84.7% (166 of 196) of piperacillin-tazobactam patients and 87.3% (90 of 103) of clindamycin-gentamicin patients. Among those evaluable for bacteriologic response, 78% (67 of 86) and 82% (23 of 28), respectively, had a favorable response. Diarrhea occurred significantly more frequently in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (9.7 versus 2.9%; P = .04), but the majority of episodes were mild to moderate. None of the adverse experiences in either treatment group were considered life-threatening and drug-related.
CONCLUSION: The combination of piperacillin and tazobactam is an effective and well-tolerated antibiotic regimen for the treatment of infections of the upper genital tract in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8290195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

1.  Cross-Canada survey of resistance of 2747 aerobic blood culture isolates to piperacillin/tazobactam and other antibiotics.

Authors:  K R Forward; P A Franks; D E Low; R Rennie; A E Simor
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01

2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two multiple-dose piperacillin-tazobactam regimens.

Authors:  D J Occhipinti; S L Pendland; L L Schoonover; E B Rypins; L H Danziger; K A Rodvold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Piperacillin/tazobactam: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.

Authors:  C M Perry; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.

Authors:  M Young; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Gram-positive anaerobic cocci.

Authors:  D A Murdoch
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Study of the comparative activity of piperacillin/tazobactam with currently available antibiotics against 8206 aerobic isolates.

Authors:  K R Forward; D E Low; M Laverdiere; R Rennie; A E Simor; P A Franks
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1997-05

7.  Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis.

Authors:  C Jaccard; N Troillet; S Harbarth; G Zanetti; D Aymon; R Schneider; R Chiolero; B Ricou; J Romand; O Huber; P Ambrosetti; G Praz; D Lew; J Bille; M P Glauser; A Cometta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Ricardo F Savaris; Daniele G Fuhrich; Jackson Maissiat; Rui V Duarte; Jonathan Ross
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-20

9.  Ertapenem once a day versus piperacillin-tazobactam every 6 hours for treatment of acute pelvic infections: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Subir Roy; Iliana Higareda; Edith Angel-Muller; Mahmoud Ismail; Caren Hague; Ben Adeyi; Gail L Woods; Hedy Teppler
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003

10.  Piperacillin/Tazobactam (ZOSYN).

Authors:  S M Culver; M G Martens
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.