Literature DB >> 8289711

History, current status, and trends of radiation protection standards.

W R Hendee1.   

Abstract

Quantitative standards for protection against exposure to ionizing radiation were first formulated in the 1930s. Since that time, standards have been restated periodically in different radiation units and conceptual frameworks that reflect improved understanding of the biological effects of radiation interactions and their consequences for human health. In the 1970s the expression of protection standards shifted from a dose- to a risk-based approach, with dose limits established to yield risks to radiation workers comparable with those for workers in other "safe" industries. Over the years, radiation protection standards have exhibited a downward trend to more rigorous limits that require increased commitments of personnel and resources for their enforcement. There are several reasons for this trend, including increased recognition of the long-term health effects of radiation, improved protection measures that permit radiation use at lower levels of exposure, growing numbers of persons exposed occupationally to radiation, and probably a greater intolerance to involuntary risks in society, with radiation targeted as a highly visible source of involuntary risks in the form of nuclear power plants and radioactive waste sites. In the past few years, reports of the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, and the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences have presented increased risk estimates for radiation exposure as a consequence of ongoing epidemiological analyses of human populations exposed to ionizing radiation. These risk estimates have enhanced public concern about radiation exposure and set the stage for discussions about the desirability of further reductions in exposure standards for radiation workers and members of the public. Such reductions would directly affect the professional activities, educational responsibilities, and administrative burdens of most medical and health physicists. These persons should understand the process of deriving risk estimates from epidemiological data, the factors that influence the risk estimates, how risk estimates are integrated into radiation protection standards, and the possible impact of more rigorous standards on the use of radiation in medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8289711     DOI: 10.1118/1.597153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Closed reduction internal fixation rates and procedure times for metacarpal fractures treated in a minor surgery area before and after the introduction of a mini C-arm unit.

Authors:  R C Mahabir; C M DeCroff; L Thurgood; A R Harrop
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

2.  Current attitudes of Turkish anesthesiologists to radiation exposure.

Authors:  Adnan Tüfek; Orhan Tokgöz; Ilker Öngüç Aycan; Feyzi Çelik; Abdurrahman Gümüş
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Radiation Exposure and Hand Dominance Using Mini C-Arm Fluoroscopy in Hand Surgery.

Authors:  Corey B Fuller; Montri D Wongworawat; Barth B Riedel
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-02

Review 4.  Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers.

Authors:  John Boice; Lawrence T Dauer; Kenneth R Kase; Fred A Mettler; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Are we putting ourselves in danger? Occupational hazards and job safety for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Robert C Ryu; Phillip H Behrens; Azeem T Malik; Jonathan D Lester; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-20

6.  Assessment of Radiation Protection in Hand-Shielding Products With Mini C-Arm Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Matthew B Cantlon; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-08-12

7.  The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model.

Authors:  Michael T Groover; Jacob R Hinkley; Daniel E Gerow; H Brent Bamberger; Jennifer Evans; Roland E Gazaille
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2019-06-05

8.  Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much?

Authors:  James A Wheeler; Natasha Weaver; Zsolt J Balogh; Herwig Drobetz; Andrew Kovendy; Natalie Enninghorst
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.