Literature DB >> 8289237

Redefining the goals of protein secondary structure prediction.

B Rost1, C Sander, R Schneider.   

Abstract

Secondary structure prediction recently has surpassed the 70% level of average accuracy, evaluated on the single residue states helix, strand and loop (Q3). But the ultimate goal is reliable prediction of tertiary (three-dimensional, 3D) structure, not 100% single residue accuracy for secondary structure. A comparison of pairs of structurally homologous proteins with divergent sequences reveals that considerable variation in the position and length of secondary structure segments can be accommodated within the same 3D fold. It is therefore sufficient to predict the approximate location of helix, strand, turn and loop segments, provided they are compatible with the formation of 3D structure. Accordingly, we define here a measure of segment overlap (Sov) that is somewhat insensitive to small variations in secondary structure assignments. The new segment overlap measure ranges from an ignorance level of 37% (random protein pairs) via a current level of 72% for a prediction method based on sequence profile input to neural networks (PHD) to an average 90% level for homologous protein pairs. We conclude that the highest scores one can reasonably expect for secondary structure prediction are a single residue accuracy of Q3 > 85% and a fractional segment overlap of Sov > 90%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8289237     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80007-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  55 in total

1.  Regulation of podJ expression during the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle.

Authors:  W B Crymes; D Zhang; B Ely
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Identification of related proteins with weak sequence identity using secondary structure information.

Authors:  C Geourjon; C Combet; C Blanchet; G Deléage
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Cascaded multiple classifiers for secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  M Ouali; R D King
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Coupled prediction of protein secondary and tertiary structure.

Authors:  Jens Meiler; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  PROSHIFT: protein chemical shift prediction using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Transmembrane helix predictions revisited.

Authors:  Chien Peter Chen; Andrew Kernytsky; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Integrated databanks access and sequence/structure analysis services at the PBIL.

Authors:  Guy Perrière; Christophe Combet; Simon Penel; Christophe Blanchet; Jean Thioulouse; Christophe Geourjon; Julien Grassot; Céline Charavay; Manolo Gouy; Laurent Duret; Gilbert Deléage
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Toward predicting protein topology: an approach to identifying beta hairpins.

Authors:  Xavier de la Cruz; E Gail Hutchinson; Adrian Shepherd; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  ASTRO-FOLD: a combinatorial and global optimization framework for Ab initio prediction of three-dimensional structures of proteins from the amino acid sequence.

Authors:  J L Klepeis; C A Floudas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Predicting transmembrane beta-barrels in proteomes.

Authors:  Henry R Bigelow; Donald S Petrey; Jinfeng Liu; Dariusz Przybylski; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.